Re: (late) REQUEST: Default mkfs.btrfs block size

2012-11-07 Thread Dave Chinner
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:25:38AM -0600, cwillu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:06 AM, David Sterba wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:20:39PM +, Alex wrote: > >> As one 'stuck' with 4k leaves on my main machine for the moment, can I > >> request > >> the btrfs-progs v0.20 defaults to

Re: (late) REQUEST: Default mkfs.btrfs block size

2012-11-05 Thread cwillu
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:06 AM, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:20:39PM +, Alex wrote: >> As one 'stuck' with 4k leaves on my main machine for the moment, can I >> request >> the btrfs-progs v0.20 defaults to more efficient decent block sizes before >> release. Most distro i

Re: (late) REQUEST: Default mkfs.btrfs block size

2012-11-05 Thread David Sterba
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:20:39PM +, Alex wrote: > As one 'stuck' with 4k leaves on my main machine for the moment, can I request > the btrfs-progs v0.20 defaults to more efficient decent block sizes before > release. Most distro install programs for the moment don't give access to the > optio

(late) REQUEST: Default mkfs.btrfs block size

2012-10-31 Thread Alex
Greetings! As one 'stuck' with 4k leaves on my main machine for the moment, can I request the btrfs-progs v0.20 defaults to more efficient decent block sizes before release. Most distro install programs for the moment don't give access to the options at install time and there seems to be is a sign