Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.39

2011-03-29 Thread Chris Mason
Excerpts from David Sterba's message of 2011-03-28 09:25:28 -0400: Hi, Chris, you did not add my sign-of on the unaligned fix I've posted, nor the tested-by or reported-by. Looking again into the mail, it seems like some automated-misprocessing picked the first part of the mail altough

[GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.39

2011-03-28 Thread Chris Mason
Hi everyone, The kernel.org mirror is making me pay for a mistake in my push last night. I'm still waiting for it to update the mirrors with the correct commits, so I've got the proper sha down below. Linus, I've pushed out two branches for you, for-linus and for-linus-unmerged

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.39

2011-03-28 Thread David Sterba
Hi, Chris, you did not add my sign-of on the unaligned fix I've posted, nor the tested-by or reported-by. Looking again into the mail, it seems like some automated-misprocessing picked the first part of the mail altough there was properly formated patch after '--' marker (and I've verified this

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.39

2011-03-28 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote: Linus, I've pushed out two branches for you, for-linus and for-linus-unmerged Thanks. I took the unmerged one, because I do like to see what's going on. But I did end up verifying the end result against your merge, and

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.39

2011-03-28 Thread Li Zefan
David Sterba wrote: Hi, Chris, you did not add my sign-of on the unaligned fix I've posted, nor the tested-by or reported-by. Looking again into the mail, it seems like some automated-misprocessing picked the first part of the mail altough there was properly formated patch after '--' marker