Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: if we've already started a trans handle, use that one

On 04/15/2011 01:36 PM, Chris Mason wrote: Excerpts from Josef Bacik's message of 2011-04-15 12:56:15 -0400: We currently track trans handles in current->journal_info, but we don't actually use it. This patch fixes it. This will cover the case where we have multiple people starting transaction

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: if we've already started a trans handle, use that one

Excerpts from Josef Bacik's message of 2011-04-15 12:56:15 -0400: > We currently track trans handles in current->journal_info, but we don't > actually > use it. This patch fixes it. This will cover the case where we have multiple > people starting transactions down the call chain. This keeps us

[PATCH] Btrfs: if we've already started a trans handle, use that one

We currently track trans handles in current->journal_info, but we don't actually use it. This patch fixes it. This will cover the case where we have multiple people starting transactions down the call chain. This keeps us from having to allocate a new handle and all of that, we just increase the

[PATCH] Btrfs: if we've already started a trans handle, use that one

We currently track trans handles in current->journal_info, but we don't actually use it. This patch fixes it. This will cover the case where we have multiple people starting transactions down the call chain. This keeps us from having to allocate a new handle and all of that, we just increase the