On 12/05/2017 04:40 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:30:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年12月05日 16:26, Anand Jain wrote:
btrfs balance needs --full-balance option since 4.6, so check the
version and then use it.
As this may be useful for other btrfs tests as well, so
On 12/05/2017 04:30 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年12月05日 16:26, Anand Jain wrote:
btrfs balance needs --full-balance option since 4.6, so check the
version and then use it.
As this may be useful for other btrfs tests as well, so this patch
adds _btrfs_full_balance_option() to the
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:30:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年12月05日 16:26, Anand Jain wrote:
> > btrfs balance needs --full-balance option since 4.6, so check the
> > version and then use it.
> >
> > As this may be useful for other btrfs tests as well, so this patch
> > adds
On 2017年12月05日 16:26, Anand Jain wrote:
> btrfs balance needs --full-balance option since 4.6, so check the
> version and then use it.
>
> As this may be useful for other btrfs tests as well, so this patch
> adds _btrfs_full_balance_option() to the common/btrfs file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand
btrfs balance needs --full-balance option since 4.6, so check the
version and then use it.
As this may be useful for other btrfs tests as well, so this patch
adds _btrfs_full_balance_option() to the common/btrfs file.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain
---
common/btrfs| 13