On 2018/12/4 下午9:52, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:15:13PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Gentle ping.
>>
>> Please put this patch into current release as the new block group size
>> limit check introduced in v4.19 is causing at least 2 reports in mail list.
>
> BTW, if there's
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:15:13PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Gentle ping.
>
> Please put this patch into current release as the new block group size
> limit check introduced in v4.19 is causing at least 2 reports in mail list.
BTW, if there's an urgent fix or patch that should be considered for
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:15:13PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Gentle ping.
>
> Please put this patch into current release as the new block group size
> limit check introduced in v4.19 is causing at least 2 reports in mail list.
I see, on the way to 4.20-rc with stable tags. Thanks.
Gentle ping.
Please put this patch into current release as the new block group size
limit check introduced in v4.19 is causing at least 2 reports in mail list.
Thanks,
Qu
On 2018/11/23 上午9:06, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> A completely valid btrfs will refuse to mount, with error message like:
>
[BUG]
A completely valid btrfs will refuse to mount, with error message like:
BTRFS critical (device sdb2): corrupt leaf: root=2 block=239681536 slot=172 \
bg_start=12018974720 bg_len=10888413184, invalid block group size, \
have 10888413184 expect (0, 10737418240]
Btrfs check returns
