-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/2/15 8:33 AM, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:11:06 -0400 From: Jeff Mahoney
>> To: linux-btrfs ,
>> fste...@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] xfstest
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:11:06 -0400
> From: Jeff Mahoney
> To: linux-btrfs , fste...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] xfstests: generic: test for discard properly discarding
> unused extents
>
> This tests tests four con
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 03:01:07PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/1/15 2:44 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:11:06PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> >> This tests tests four conditions where discard can potentially
> >> not
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 03:01:07PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/1/15 2:44 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:11:06PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> >> This tests tests four conditions where discard can potentially
> >> not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/1/15 2:44 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:11:06PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> This tests tests four conditions where discard can potentially
>> not discard unused extents completely.
>>
>> We test, with -o discard and with
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:11:06PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> This tests tests four conditions where discard can potentially not
> discard unused extents completely.
>
> We test, with -o discard and with fstrim, scenarios of removing many
> relatively small files and removing several large files
This tests tests four conditions where discard can potentially not
discard unused extents completely.
We test, with -o discard and with fstrim, scenarios of removing many
relatively small files and removing several large files.
The important part of the two scenarios is that the large files must
