Re: [PATCH 00/11 v2] Btrfs: improve write ahead log with sub transaction

2011-06-09 Thread David Sterba
Hi, is it possible to refresh this patchset and resend? I'd like to enroll it and give it some review and testing. So far I have seen notions and use of trans_mutex, which has been removed. thanks, david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a

Re: [PATCH 00/11 v2] Btrfs: improve write ahead log with sub transaction

2011-06-09 Thread liubo
On 06/10/2011 08:40 AM, David Sterba wrote: Hi, is it possible to refresh this patchset and resend? I'd like to enroll it and give it some review and testing. So far I have seen notions and use of trans_mutex, which has been removed. Sure, thanks for the passion. Yea, I've noticed the

[PATCH 00/11 v2] Btrfs: improve write ahead log with sub transaction

2011-05-26 Thread Liu Bo
I've been working to try to improve the write-ahead log's performance, and I found that the bottleneck addresses in the checksum items, especially when we want to make a random write on a large file, e.g a 4G file. Then a idea for this suggested by Chris is to use sub transaction ids and just to

Re: [PATCH 00/11 v2] Btrfs: improve write ahead log with sub transaction

2011-05-26 Thread liubo
This includes the two patches that we've discussed before. I sent this as a whole just in case you have to patch the code by yourself. :) thanks, liubo On 05/26/2011 04:19 PM, Liu Bo wrote: I've been working to try to improve the write-ahead log's performance, and I found that the bottleneck