On 08/08/2013 07:02 PM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, August 08, 2013 at 07:04 (+0200), Wang Shilong wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index cb73a12..54e7610 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:04:17PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
Sorry, I don't think I understand why it's a memory leak, some explanation
is needed here.
-liubo
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 2 +-
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:04:17PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
I think I know the whys :p, but still a log is preferred.
-liubo
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:22:12 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:04:17PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
I think I know the whys :p, but still a log is preferred.
Right, we need a
