Re: [PATCH 2/3] misc: fix fallocate commands that need the unshare switch

2016-10-17 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:18:37PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:03:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The poster child would be btrfs, and I would have added some output > > here if btrfs support in xfstests wasn't completely broken at this > > point. > > > >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] misc: fix fallocate commands that need the unshare switch

2016-10-16 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:03:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The poster child would be btrfs, and I would have added some output > here if btrfs support in xfstests wasn't completely broken at this > point. > > Well, added Ccs and some output anyway in this case.. Turns out the btrfs

Re: [PATCH 2/3] misc: fix fallocate commands that need the unshare switch

2016-10-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:13:02AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > We re-added the UNSHARE flag to fallocate, so go make sure that all > the unshare tests actually check that the xfs_io falloc command > supports that flag. We'll need to improve _require_xfs_io_command to actually run the command