Fix the mirror_num determination in scrub_stripe. The rest of the scrub code did not use mirror_num for anything important and that error went unnoticed. The nodatasum fixup patch of this set depends on a correct mirror_num.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.bt...@jan-o-sch.net> --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 10 +++++----- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index e294d76..ec29ce8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -913,21 +913,21 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_dev *sdev, if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0) { offset = map->stripe_len * num; increment = map->stripe_len * map->num_stripes; - mirror_num = 0; + mirror_num = 1; } else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) { int factor = map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes; offset = map->stripe_len * (num / map->sub_stripes); increment = map->stripe_len * factor; - mirror_num = num % map->sub_stripes; + mirror_num = num % map->sub_stripes + 1; } else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) { increment = map->stripe_len; - mirror_num = num % map->num_stripes; + mirror_num = num % map->num_stripes + 1; } else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP) { increment = map->stripe_len; - mirror_num = num % map->num_stripes; + mirror_num = num % map->num_stripes + 1; } else { increment = map->stripe_len; - mirror_num = 0; + mirror_num = 1; } path = btrfs_alloc_path(); -- 1.7.3.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html