On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:54:00PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> ::
>
> >>> @@ -1561,12 +1564,15 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct
> >>> file_system_type *fs_type,
> >>> goto error_fs_info;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - error =
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 01:08:34AM +, Gu, Jinxiang wrote:
> > > - device = device_list_add(path, disk_super, _device_added);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> > > - ret = PTR_ERR(device);
> > > - } else {
> > > - *fs_devices_ret = device->fs_devices;
> > > - if
::
@@ -1561,12 +1564,15 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct
file_system_type *fs_type,
goto error_fs_info;
}
- error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type, _devices);
- if (error) {
+ device =
> -Original Message-
> From: David Sterba [mailto:dste...@suse.cz]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 8:34 PM
> To: Gu, Jinxiang/顾 金香
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; anand.j...@oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from
> btrfs_scan_o
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 05:11:17PM +0800, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
> btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
>
> And since btrfs_fs_devices can be get by btrfs_device,
> better to return btrfs_device than fs_btrfs_devices.
>
>
Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
And since btrfs_fs_devices can be get by btrfs_device,
better to return btrfs_device than fs_btrfs_devices.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang
---
Changelog:
v5: rebase to misc-next.
v4: as
