Re: 2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-23 Thread Steven Pratt
Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 04:51:12PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: This changeset introduced btrfs_start_one_delalloc_inode in

Re: 2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-23 Thread Steven Pratt
Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:13:53PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: This did not seem to help, in fact we regressed more with COW enabled.. One thing to note, the last 2 sets of runs in the history graphs were actually run by Keith and he used stock kernel trees. For my

Re: 2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-21 Thread Steven Pratt
Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 04:51:12PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: This changeset introduced btrfs_start_one_delalloc_inode in http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git;a=commitdiff;h=5da9d01b66458b180a6bee0e637a1d0a3effc622 In

Re: 2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-16 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:44:11PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: Here is the latest set of performance runs from the 2.6.35-rc5 tree. Included is a refresh of all the other filesystems with some changes for barriers on and off since this has been somewhat of a hot topic recently. New data

Re: 2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-16 Thread Steven Pratt
Chris Mason wrote: On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:44:11PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: Here is the latest set of performance runs from the 2.6.35-rc5 tree. Included is a refresh of all the other filesystems with some changes for barriers on and off since this has been somewhat of a hot topic

Re: 2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-07 Thread A. James Lewis
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:44:11PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: Here is the latest set of performance runs from the 2.6.35-rc5 tree. Included is a refresh of all the other filesystems with some changes for barriers on and off since this has been somewhat of a hot topic recently. New

2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-06 Thread Steven Pratt
Here is the latest set of performance runs from the 2.6.35-rc5 tree. Included is a refresh of all the other filesystems with some changes for barriers on and off since this has been somewhat of a hot topic recently. New data linked in to the history graphs here:

Re: 2.6.35 performance results

2010-08-06 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:44:11PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: Here is the latest set of performance runs from the 2.6.35-rc5 tree. Included is a refresh of all the other filesystems with some changes for barriers on and off since this has been somewhat of a hot topic recently. New data