On 07/24/2016 08:36 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:02:35PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Can you please run the attached test program:
gcc -o short-write short-write.c -lpthread
./short-write some-new-file-on-btrfs
Hi Chris, this seems like a useful thing to be testing on a
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:02:35PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Can you please run the attached test program:
>
> gcc -o short-write short-write.c -lpthread
> ./short-write some-new-file-on-btrfs
Hi Chris, this seems like a useful thing to be testing on a regular
basis - can you turn this into an
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:25:02PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> On 21.07.2016 14:56, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On 07/20/2016 01:50 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
> >> After 24h of running the program and thundirbird all is still fine here.
> >>
> >> I let it run one more day.. But looks very good.
> >>
> >
> >
On 21.07.2016 14:56, Chris Mason wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 01:50 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
>>
>> After 24h of running the program and thundirbird all is still fine here.
>>
>> I let it run one more day.. But looks very good.
>>
>
> Thanks for your time in helping to track this down. It'll go into the
On 07/20/2016 01:50 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
After 24h of running the program and thundirbird all is still fine here.
I let it run one more day.. But looks very good.
Thanks for your time in helping to track this down. It'll go into the
next merge window and be cc'd to stable.
-chris
--
To
On 20.07.2016 15:50, Chris Mason wrote:
>
>
> On 07/19/2016 08:11 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19.07.2016 13:05, Chris Mason wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:28:01AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
Hi Chris,
I am able to reproduce the issue with the 'short-write'
On 07/19/2016 08:11 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
On 19.07.2016 13:05, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:28:01AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
Hi Chris,
I am able to reproduce the issue with the 'short-write' program. But before
the call trace associated with btrfs_destroy_inode(), I
On 19.07.2016 13:05, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:28:01AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I am able to reproduce the issue with the 'short-write' program. But before
>> the call trace associated with btrfs_destroy_inode(), I see the following
>> call
>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:28:01AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
Hi Chris,
I am able to reproduce the issue with the 'short-write' program. But before
the call trace associated with btrfs_destroy_inode(), I see the following call
trace ...
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 2
On 07/15/2016 03:35 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 ( didn't tested
other versions )
I trigger the following :
[ 6393.305675] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 5870 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9306
On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 ( didn't tested
other versions )
I trigger the following :
[ 6393.305675] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 5870 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9306
btrfs_destroy_inode+0x22e/0x2a0 [btrfs]
Every time I've
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:28:01AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
On Friday, July 08, 2016 12:02:35 PM Chris Mason wrote:
Can you please run the attached test program:
gcc -o short-write short-write.c -lpthread
./short-write some-new-file-on-btrfs
I want to see if you're triggering the same
On Friday, July 08, 2016 12:02:35 PM Chris Mason wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2016 11:02 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
> > On 08.07.2016 14:41, Chris Mason wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/08/2016 05:57 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
> >>> 2016-07-07 21:21 GMT+02:00 Chris Mason :
>
>
> On
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:21:16PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:02:35PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On 07/08/2016 11:02 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > [btrfs_destroy_inode again]
>
> > Can you please run the attached test program:
> >
> > gcc -o short-write
Chris Mason posted on Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:02:35 -0400 as excerpted:
> Can you please run the attached test program:
Umm... you want him to run it on the affected 4.6.x and late 4.7-rcs, not
on the unaffected 4.5.x, correct?
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:02:35PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 11:02 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
> > [btrfs_destroy_inode again]
> Can you please run the attached test program:
>
> gcc -o short-write short-write.c -lpthread
> ./short-write some-new-file-on-btrfs
>
> I want to see if
On 07/08/2016 11:02 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
On 08.07.2016 14:41, Chris Mason wrote:
On 07/08/2016 05:57 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
2016-07-07 21:21 GMT+02:00 Chris Mason :
On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 (
On 08.07.2016 14:41, Chris Mason wrote:
On 07/08/2016 05:57 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
2016-07-07 21:21 GMT+02:00 Chris Mason :
On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 ( didn't tested
other versions )
I trigger the
2016-07-08 14:41 GMT+02:00 Chris Mason :
>
>
> On 07/08/2016 05:57 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
>>
>> 2016-07-07 21:21 GMT+02:00 Chris Mason :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and
On 07/08/2016 05:57 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
2016-07-07 21:21 GMT+02:00 Chris Mason :
On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 ( didn't tested
other versions )
I trigger the following :
I definitely thought we had
2016-07-07 21:21 GMT+02:00 Chris Mason :
>
>
> On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 ( didn't tested
>> other versions )
>> I trigger the following :
>
>
> I definitely thought we had this fixed in v4.7-rc. Can
On 07/07/2016 06:24 AM, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 ( didn't tested
other versions )
I trigger the following :
I definitely thought we had this fixed in v4.7-rc. Can you easily fsck
this filesystem? Something strange is going on.
-chris
Hi,
while running thunderbird on linux 4.6.3 and 4.7.0-rc6 ( didn't tested
other versions )
I trigger the following :
[ 6393.305675] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 5870 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9306
btrfs_destroy_inode+0x22e/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 6393.305677] Modules linked in: fuse ufs qnx4 hfsplus hfs minix ntfs
23 matches
Mail list logo