On 02/21/2013 10:56 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:58:16PM +0100, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>> On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
>>> Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
closer, but it'
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:58:16PM +0100, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> > Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> >> Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
> >> closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recomm
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:47:28 +0100
Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> > Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
> > closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong
> > recommendation to keep up with the latest code. Hugo.
>
> T
On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
>> Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
>> closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
>> to keep up with the latest code. Hugo.
>
> The matter is tha
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:47:28PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> > Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
> > closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
> > to keep up with the latest code. Hugo.
>
Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
> closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
> to keep up with the latest code. Hugo.
The matter is that BTRFS had many early adopters just because it is -
and
Le 21/02/2013 17:38, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> Plus, if something does go wrong with your FS, and you're running an
> older kernel, you'll get limited amounts of sympathy, because quite a
> lot of the problems people encounter with older kernels have already
> been fixed in newer ones.
The matter, as
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Le 21/02/2013 17:38, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> > Plus, if something does go wrong with your FS, and you're running an
> > older kernel, you'll get limited amounts of sympathy, because quite a
> > lot of the problems people encounter w
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:01:30PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Le 21/02/2013 16:54, Calvin Walton a écrit :
> > You really should upgrade your kernel, however. 3.5.0 is rather old in
> > btrfs-years! Lots of fixes have gone into newer kernels.
>
> Hi Calvin,
>
> I expect Ubuntu 13.04 to come
On 02/21/2013 08:01 AM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 16:54, Calvin Walton a écrit :
You really should upgrade your kernel, however. 3.5.0 is rather old in
btrfs-years! Lots of fixes have gone into newer kernels.
Hi Calvin,
I expect Ubuntu 13.04 to come with kernel 3.7 in April.
13.
Le 21/02/2013 16:54, Calvin Walton a écrit :
> You really should upgrade your kernel, however. 3.5.0 is rather old in
> btrfs-years! Lots of fixes have gone into newer kernels.
Hi Calvin,
I expect Ubuntu 13.04 to come with kernel 3.7 in April. Having Ubuntu
kernel upgrades every 6 months (and sev
Le 21/02/2013 16:50, Liu Bo a écrit :
> Well, there is already a patch which addresses your concern and it's
> 'snapshot-aware defrag' feature and now in v6, it's not merged yet.
> thanks, liubo
Hi Liu,
So should I understand that, even though the manpage states that the
issue is for kernels <=
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 16:46 +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Having numerous snapshots, I prefer to ask rather than take the risk of
> exploding my storage space, better safe than sorry ;-)
>
> "man btrfs" states :
>
> « NOTE: defragmenting with kernels up to 2.6.37 will unlink COW
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:46:14PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Having numerous snapshots, I prefer to ask rather than take the risk of
> exploding my storage space, better safe than sorry ;-)
>
> "man btrfs" states :
>
> « NOTE: defragmenting with kernels up to 2.6.37 will unl
Hi again,
Having numerous snapshots, I prefer to ask rather than take the risk of
exploding my storage space, better safe than sorry ;-)
"man btrfs" states :
« NOTE: defragmenting with kernels up to 2.6.37 will unlink COW-ed
copies of data, don't use it if you use snapshots, have
deduplicat
15 matches
Mail list logo
