On 2015-10-08 18:22, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:16:43AM +0200, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Hugo,
On Thursday 08 of October 2015 23:13:52 Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:47:33AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-10-08 04:28, Pavel Pisa wrote:
I go to use
Hello everybody,
On Monday 05 of October 2015 22:26:46 Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello everybody,
...
> BTRFS has recognized appearance of its partition (even that hanged
> from sdb5 to sde5 when disk "hotplugged" again).
> But it seems that RAID1 components are not in sync and BTRFS
> continues to
On 2015-10-08 04:28, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello everybody,
On Monday 05 of October 2015 22:26:46 Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello everybody,
...
BTRFS has recognized appearance of its partition (even that hanged
from sdb5 to sde5 when disk "hotplugged" again).
But it seems that RAID1 components are not
Hello Austin,
thanks for reply.
On Thursday 08 of October 2015 13:47:33 Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-10-08 04:28, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
...
> > It seems that SATA controller is not able to activate link which
> > has not been connected at BIOS POST time. This means that
Hello Hugo,
On Thursday 08 of October 2015 23:13:52 Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:47:33AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> > On 2015-10-08 04:28, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > >I go to use "btrfs replace" because there has not been any reply to my
> > > inplace correction question.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:16:43AM +0200, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Hugo,
>
> On Thursday 08 of October 2015 23:13:52 Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:47:33AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> > > On 2015-10-08 04:28, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > > >I go to use "btrfs replace" because
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:47:33AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-10-08 04:28, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> >I go to use "btrfs replace" because there has not been any reply to my
> >inplace correction
> >question. But I expect that clarification if possible/how to resync RAID1
> >after one