On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:10:24AM -0700, Jan Steffens wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:04:08PM -0700, Jan Steffens wrote:
After a lockup requiring a hard reset, the btrfs could not be mounted,
throwing the following
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
I posted a patch for this before I left for Christmas vacation, it is here
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git;a=commit;h=ee2399d8a7dd1d49b0996beda5b728b35bf1
in btrfs-next. Can you give it
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:36:36AM -0700, Jan Steffens wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
I posted a patch for this before I left for Christmas vacation, it is here
On Friday 14 December 2012 23:04:08 Jan Steffens wrote:
After a lockup requiring a hard reset, the btrfs could not be mounted,
throwing the following error:
Bug affected at least 3.6.10, 3.7.0, i686 and x86_64.
btrfs-zero-log made the FS mountable again.
I've just encountered the same
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
if (!caching_ctl) {
BUG_ON(!block_group_cache_done(block_group));
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(block_group, start, num_bytes);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */ // 6185
The actual
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:04:08PM -0700, Jan Steffens wrote:
After a lockup requiring a hard reset, the btrfs could not be mounted,
throwing the following error:
Could you tell me what line this comes out to? Give me a few lines of context
so I can figure out where it's happening. Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:04:08PM -0700, Jan Steffens wrote:
After a lockup requiring a hard reset, the btrfs could not be mounted,
throwing the following error:
Could you tell me what line this comes out to? Give me a
