On 2017-07-29 19:04, Cloud Admin wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Cloud Admin:
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 10:25 -0400 schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
On 2017-07-24 10:12, Cloud Admin wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Austin S.
Hemmelgarn:
On 2017-07-24
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Cloud Admin:
> Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 10:25 -0400 schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
> > On 2017-07-24 10:12, Cloud Admin wrote:
> > > Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Austin S.
> > > Hemmelgarn:
> > > > On 2017-07-24 07:27, Cloud Admin
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 20:42 + schrieb Hugo Mills:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:35:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Cloud Admin > r.eu> wrote:
> >
> > > I am a little bit confused because the balance command is running
> > >
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 23:12 +0200 schrieb waxhead:
>
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> This may be a stupid question , but are your pool of butter (or
> BTRFS
> pool) by any chance hooked up via USB? If this is USB2.0 at
No, it is a SATA array with (currently) four 8TB discs.
--
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Marat Khalili wrote:
>>> This may be a stupid question , but are your pool of butter (or BTRFS pool)
>>> by any chance hooked up via USB? If this is USB2.0 at 480mitb/s then it is
>>> about 57MB/s / 4 drives = roughly 14.25 or about 11MB/s if you
>> This may be a stupid question , but are your pool of butter (or BTRFS pool)
>> by any chance hooked up via USB? If this is USB2.0 at 480mitb/s then it is
>> about 57MB/s / 4 drives = roughly 14.25 or about 11MB/s if you shave off
>> some overhead.
>
>Nope, USB 3. Typically on scrubs I get
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:55:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Egads.
>>
>> Maybe Cloud Admin ought to consider using a filter to just balance the
>> data chunks across the three devices, and just leave the metadata on
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:12 PM, waxhead wrote:
>
>
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Cloud Admin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am a little bit confused because the balance command is running since
>>> 12 hours and only 3GB of
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:55:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Egads.
>
> Maybe Cloud Admin ought to consider using a filter to just balance the
> data chunks across the three devices, and just leave the metadata on
> the original two disks?
Balancing when adding a new disk isn't that important
Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Cloud Admin wrote:
I am a little bit confused because the balance command is running since
12 hours and only 3GB of data are touched.
That's incredibly slow. Something isn't right.
Using btrfs-debug -b from
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:55:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>
> >
> >In my experience, it's pretty consistent at about a minute per 1
> > GiB for data on rotational drives on RAID-1. For metadata, it can go
> > up to
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>
>In my experience, it's pretty consistent at about a minute per 1
> GiB for data on rotational drives on RAID-1. For metadata, it can go
> up to several hours (or more) per 256 MiB chunk, depending on what
> kind of
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:35:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Cloud Admin
> wrote:
>
> > I am a little bit confused because the balance command is running since
> > 12 hours and only 3GB of data are touched.
>
> That's incredibly
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Cloud Admin wrote:
> I am a little bit confused because the balance command is running since
> 12 hours and only 3GB of data are touched.
That's incredibly slow. Something isn't right.
Using btrfs-debug -b from btrfs-progs, I've
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 10:25 -0400 schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
> On 2017-07-24 10:12, Cloud Admin wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Austin S.
> > Hemmelgarn:
> > > On 2017-07-24 07:27, Cloud Admin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I have a multi-device pool (three discs) as
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 19:08 +0500 schrieb Roman Mamedov:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:46:34 -0400
> "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" wrote:
>
> > > I am a little bit confused because the balance command is running
> > > since
> > > 12 hours and only 3GB of data are touched. This
On 2017-07-24 10:12, Cloud Admin wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
On 2017-07-24 07:27, Cloud Admin wrote:
Hi,
I have a multi-device pool (three discs) as RAID1. Now I want to
add a
new disc to increase the pool. I followed the description on https:
Am Montag, den 24.07.2017, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
> On 2017-07-24 07:27, Cloud Admin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a multi-device pool (three discs) as RAID1. Now I want to
> > add a
> > new disc to increase the pool. I followed the description on https:
> > //bt
> >
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:46:34 -0400
"Austin S. Hemmelgarn" wrote:
> > I am a little bit confused because the balance command is running since
> > 12 hours and only 3GB of data are touched. This would mean the whole
> > balance process (new disc has 8TB) would run a long,
On 2017-07-24 07:27, Cloud Admin wrote:
Hi,
I have a multi-device pool (three discs) as RAID1. Now I want to add a
new disc to increase the pool. I followed the description on https://bt
rfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices and
used 'btrfs add '. After that I called a
Hi,
I have a multi-device pool (three discs) as RAID1. Now I want to add a
new disc to increase the pool. I followed the description on https://bt
rfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices and
used 'btrfs add '. After that I called a balance
for rebalancing the RAID1 using
21 matches
Mail list logo