Re: Btrfsck errors (fs tree 565 refs 125 not found) - how serious

2013-05-31 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, You are running on an unmounted fs right? Also please make sure you are running the git version Yes, the fs was properly unmounted. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git I still get those errors, I'll try to file a bug-report with the tools/data

Re: Btrfsck errors (fs tree 565 refs 125 not found) - how serious

2013-05-30 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi again, I am able to induce the btrfsck errors I experienced using a synthetic workload on a fresh filesystem with linux-3.10.0.rc2. However as filing the bug-report would take quite some time (uploading 512mb trace-files, writing a short read-me, ...) I wonder whether this is an issue woth of

Re: Btrfsck errors (fs tree 565 refs 125 not found) - how serious

2013-05-30 Thread Josef Bacik
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:06:50PM -0600, Clemens Eisserer wrote: Hi again, I am able to induce the btrfsck errors I experienced using a synthetic workload on a fresh filesystem with linux-3.10.0.rc2. However as filing the bug-report would take quite some time (uploading 512mb trace-files,

Btrfsck errors (fs tree 565 refs 125 not found) - how serious

2013-05-26 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, For about 3 weeks I've been using btrfs on my desktop machine, using the snapshot-functionality quite a lot. Today I ran btrfsck and got about ~10MB of output which looks like: fs tree 565 refs 125 not found unresolved ref root 807 dir 813347 index 277 namelen 39 name