Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:27:30 -0500
schrieb Tim Cuthbertson :
> I have recently switched from multiple partitions with multiple
> btrfs's to a flat layout. I will try to keep my question concise.
>
> I am confused as to whether a snapshots container should be a normal
>
On 2017-03-30 09:07, Tim Cuthbertson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
Tim Cuthbertson posted on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:20:52 -0500 as excerpted:
So, another question...
Do I then leave the top level mounted all the time for snapshots, or
should I
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Tim Cuthbertson posted on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:20:52 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> So, another question...
>>
>> Do I then leave the top level mounted all the time for snapshots, or
>> should I create them, send them to external
Tim Cuthbertson posted on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:20:52 -0500 as excerpted:
> So, another question...
>
> Do I then leave the top level mounted all the time for snapshots, or
> should I create them, send them to external storage, and umount until
> next time?
Keep in mind that because snapshots
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hugo Mills <h...@carfax.org.uk>
Date: Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Confusion about snapshots containers
To: Tim Cuthbertson <ratch...@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:27:30PM -0500, Tim Cuthbertson wrote:
> I have recently switched from multiple partitions with multiple
> btrfs's to a flat layout. I will try to keep my question concise.
>
> I am confused as to whether a snapshots container should be a normal
> directory or a
I have recently switched from multiple partitions with multiple
btrfs's to a flat layout. I will try to keep my question concise.
I am confused as to whether a snapshots container should be a normal
directory or a mountable subvolume. I do not understand how it can be
a normal directory while