Hi Florian,
On 10/02/13 00:35, Florian Hofmann wrote:
> (Sadly) No SSD.
I think Marc was asking as they can cause issues, so don't be sad. :-)
> I just upgraded from kernel version 3.7.5 to 3.7.6 (running Arch
> Linux) with no change in behavior.
There are rarely any updates to btrfs in stable
@Leonidas: I don't think so ... this is running on a i7 core and lzo
is pretty damn fast.
2013/2/11 Leonidas Spyropoulos :
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:12:17PM -0700, Florian Hofmann wrote:
>>> I ran it as root. The first times there was no o
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:12:17PM -0700, Florian Hofmann wrote:
>> I ran it as root. The first times there was no output whatsoever. This
>> time triggering gave the SysRq : Show Blocked State line. Strange
>>
>
> Well that's weird, it looks l
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:12:17PM -0700, Florian Hofmann wrote:
> I ran it as root. The first times there was no output whatsoever. This
> time triggering gave the SysRq : Show Blocked State line. Strange
>
Well that's weird, it looks like you don't have any blocked tasks, so either
sysrq+w is sc
(Sadly) No SSD.
I just upgraded from kernel version 3.7.5 to 3.7.6 (running Arch
Linux) with no change in behavior.
2013/2/9 Marc MERLIN :
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:30:04PM +0100, Florian Hofmann wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am
>> experi
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:30:04PM +0100, Florian Hofmann wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am
> experiencing severe performance drawbacks. I can't qualify the
> circumstances, but sometimes during disc access the whole system
> freezes for some tim
I ran it as root. The first times there was no output whatsoever. This
time triggering gave the SysRq : Show Blocked State line. Strange
2013/2/9 cwillu :
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Florian Hofmann
> wrote:
>> Oh ... I should have mentioned that btrfs is running on top of LUKS.
>>
>> 2013/
I just had another big freeze ... I could change to a terminal and
sysrq-triggering gave this: http://pastebin.com/F1jQqtUQ
2013/2/8 Florian Hofmann :
> Oh ... I should have mentioned that btrfs is running on top of LUKS.
>
> 2013/2/8 Florian Hofmann :
>> $ btrfs fi df /
>> Data: total=165.00GB, u
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Florian Hofmann
wrote:
> Oh ... I should have mentioned that btrfs is running on top of LUKS.
>
> 2013/2/8 Florian Hofmann :
>> $ btrfs fi df /
>> Data: total=165.00GB, used=164.19GB
>> System, DUP: total=32.00MB, used=28.00KB
>> System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
>> M
Oh ... I should have mentioned that btrfs is running on top of LUKS.
2013/2/8 Florian Hofmann :
> $ btrfs fi df /
> Data: total=165.00GB, used=164.19GB
> System, DUP: total=32.00MB, used=28.00KB
> System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
> Metadata, DUP: total=2.00GB, used=1.40GB
>
> $ btrfs fi show
> fail
$ btrfs fi df /
Data: total=165.00GB, used=164.19GB
System, DUP: total=32.00MB, used=28.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=2.00GB, used=1.40GB
$ btrfs fi show
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none uuid: b4ec0b14-2a42-47e3-a0cd-1257e789ed25
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 165.59
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:30:04PM -0700, Florian Hofmann wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am
> experiencing severe performance drawbacks. I can't qualify the
> circumstances, but sometimes during disc access the whole system
> freezes for some tim
12 matches
Mail list logo
