Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
excessive block groups are created. I guess it should be implemented
as a balance option rather than a separate ioctl, but this was good
enough for me to try it.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva ol...@lsd.ic.unicamp.br
---
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 07:43:07PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:40:56PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
clustered allocation allocated lots of unnecessary metadata block
groups. It's also useful to
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 07:43:07PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:40:56PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
clustered allocation allocated lots
On Nov 15, 2011, Ilya Dryomov idryo...@gmail.com wrote:
And the exact command to mimic your patch is
btrfs fi restripe start -m mount point
Thanks. I wasn't aware of the restripe patch when I wrote this Quick
Hack (TM).
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighterhttp://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You
Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
clustered allocation allocated lots of unnecessary metadata block
groups. It's also useful to measure performance differences between
-o cluster and -o nocluster.
I guess it should be implemented as a balance option rather than a
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:40:56PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
clustered allocation allocated lots of unnecessary metadata block
groups. It's also useful to measure performance differences between
-o cluster and -o nocluster.
On Nov 10, 2011, Alexandre Oliva ol...@lsd.ic.unicamp.br wrote:
Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
clustered allocation allocated lots of unnecessary metadata block
groups. It's also useful to measure performance differences between
-o cluster and -o nocluster.
