Re: Linux-next regression?

2018-12-05 Thread Chris Mason
On 5 Dec 2018, at 5:59, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:29:49PM +, Chris Mason wrote: >> I think (hope) this is: >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685 >> >> Which was just nailed down to a blkmq bug. It triggers when you have >> scsi devices using

Re: Linux-next regression?

2018-12-05 Thread Andrea Gelmini
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:29:49PM +, Chris Mason wrote: > I think (hope) this is: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685 > > Which was just nailed down to a blkmq bug. It triggers when you have > scsi devices using elevator=none over blkmq. Thanks a lot Chris. Really.

Re: Linux-next regression?

2018-12-04 Thread Chris Mason
On 28 Nov 2018, at 11:05, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:16:52PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> But it's less a concerning problem since it doesn't reach latest RC, >> so >> if you could reproduce it stably, I'd recommend to do a bisect. > > No problem to bisect, usually. >

Re: Linux-next regression?

2018-11-28 Thread Andrea Gelmini
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:16:52PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > But it's less a concerning problem since it doesn't reach latest RC, so > if you could reproduce it stably, I'd recommend to do a bisect. No problem to bisect, usually. But right now it's not possible for me, I explain further.

Re: Linux-next regression?

2018-11-27 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2018/11/27 下午10:11, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:13:02AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> >> On 2018/11/26 下午11:01, Andrea Gelmini wrote: >>> One question: I can completely trust the ok return status of scrub? I >>> know is made for this, but shit happens... >> >> No,

Re: Linux-next regression?

2018-11-27 Thread Andrea Gelmini
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:13:02AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2018/11/26 下午11:01, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > > One question: I can completely trust the ok return status of scrub? I > > know is made for this, but shit happens... > > No, scrub only checks csum of data and tree blocks, it

Re: Linux-next regression?

2018-11-26 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2018/11/26 下午11:01, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > Hi everybody, >and thanks a lot for your work. > >I'm using BTRFS over LVM over cryptsetup, over Samsung SSD 860 EVO (latest > git of btrfs-progs). >Usually I run kernel in development, because I know BTRFS is young and > there are

Linux-next regression?

2018-11-26 Thread Andrea Gelmini
Hi everybody, and thanks a lot for your work. I'm using BTRFS over LVM over cryptsetup, over Samsung SSD 860 EVO (latest git of btrfs-progs). Usually I run kernel in development, because I know BTRFS is young and there are still lots of bugs and corner case to fix. Anyway, I just