On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:03:00 +0300, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/09/2010 05:56 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0200, Andi Kleena...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Ben Gamaribgamari.f...@gmail.com writes:
ext4/XFS/JFS/btrfs should be better in this regard
I am using btrfs, so yes, I was expecting things to be better.
the improvement seems to be non-existent under high IO/fsync load.
btrfs is known to perform poorly under fsync.
Has the reason for this been identified? Judging from the nature of metadata
loads, it would seem that it should be substantially easier to implement
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html