On 04/20/2018 02:22 PM, Gu, Jinxiang wrote:
Hi,
I reproduced this using kernel v4.17-rc1.
It is not always happens.( occurred times/test times: 1/20)
Though it was reported here, its not related to this patch set.
Instead its about the send receive.
Pls post it as a separate thread so it
2018 5:53 AM
> To: dste...@suse.cz; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] device_list_add() peparation to add
> reappearing missing device
>
>
>
> On 01/22/2018 11:26 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:31:47PM +0800, Anand Jai
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:31:47PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Problem was mainly due to the patch 3/4, which tried to access the
> return pointer even for the failed condition. The fix is to bring the
> device point access under the else part as show below [2]. I have
> included this fix
On 01/20/2018 07:27 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:47:17PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:02:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
(Apply on top of my patchset
[PATCH v4 0/6] preparatory work to add device forget
for conflict free apply. They don't
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:47:17PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:02:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> > (Apply on top of my patchset
> >[PATCH v4 0/6] preparatory work to add device forget
> > for conflict free apply. They don't actually depend on
> > each other
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:02:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> (Apply on top of my patchset
>[PATCH v4 0/6] preparatory work to add device forget
> for conflict free apply. They don't actually depend on
> each other though).
> Cleanup of device_list_add(), mainly in preparation to handle
>
