Am Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:57:17 +0300
schrieb Marat Khalili :
> Just some consideration, since I've faced similar but no exactly same
> problem: use rsync, but create snapshots on target machine. Blind
> rsync will destroy deduplication of your snapshots and take huge
> amount of
Am Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:53:17 -0400
schrieb "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" :
> > I'd like to try to back up (duplicate) the file server filesystem
> > containing these snapshot subvolumes for each remote machine. The
> > problem is that I don't think I can use send/receive to do
On 27/03/17 13:00, J. Hart wrote:
> That is a very interesting idea. I'll try some experiments with this.
You might want to look into two tools which I have found useful for
similar backups:
1) rsnapshot -- this uses rsync for backing up multiple systems and has
been stable for quite a long
That is a very interesting idea. I'll try some experiments with this.
Many Thanks for the assistance:-)
J. Hart
On 03/27/2017 01:57 AM, Marat Khalili wrote:
Just some consideration, since I've faced similar but no exactly same
problem: use rsync, but create snapshots on target machine.
On 2017-03-25 23:00, J. Hart wrote:
I have a Btrfs filesystem on a backup server. This filesystem has a
directory to hold backups for filesystems from remote machines. In this
directory is a subdirectory for each machine. Under each machine
subdirectory is one directory for each filesystem
Just some consideration, since I've faced similar but no exactly same
problem: use rsync, but create snapshots on target machine. Blind rsync
will destroy deduplication of your snapshots and take huge amount of
storage, so it's not a solution. But you can rsync --inline your
snapshots in
> [ ... ] In each filesystem subdirectory are incremental
> snapshot subvolumes for that filesystem. [ ... ] The scheme
> is something like this:
> /backup///
BTW hopefully this does not amounts to too many subvolumes in
the '.../backup/' volume, because that can create complications,
where
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 02:14:36PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> You could have done time-based snapshots on the top level (for /backup/), say,
> every 6 hours, and keep those for e.g. a month. Then don't bother with any
> other kind of subvolumes/snapshots on the backup machine, and do backups
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 23:00:20 -0400
"J. Hart" wrote:
> I have a Btrfs filesystem on a backup server. This filesystem has a
> directory to hold backups for filesystems from remote machines. In this
> directory is a subdirectory for each machine. Under each machine
>
I have a Btrfs filesystem on a backup server. This filesystem has a
directory to hold backups for filesystems from remote machines. In this
directory is a subdirectory for each machine. Under each machine
subdirectory is one directory for each filesystem (ex /boot, /home, etc)
on that
10 matches
Mail list logo