On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:07:33AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote:
I have a directory with 1.2M files in it, which makes readdir very slow
on btrfs with cold caches (although it's reasonably fast with hot caches
as in
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:39:15PM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:07:33AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote:
I have a directory with 1.2M files in it, which makes readdir very slow
on btrfs with
Sigh, wrong btrfs address on the original. Apologies for the
double-post.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:24:46PM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote:
I have a directory with 1.2M files in it, which makes readdir very slow
on btrfs with cold caches (although it's reasonably fast with hot caches
as in the
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote:
I have a directory with 1.2M files in it, which makes readdir very slow
on btrfs with cold caches (although it's reasonably fast with hot caches
as in the first example below):
Sounds like:
Bug 21562 - btrfs is dead
