On 11/17/17 18:48, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:53:15PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>>> I suggest that you try lvmcache instead. It's much more flexible than
>>> bcache,
>>> does pretty much the same job, and has much less of the "hacky" feel to it.
>>
>> I can read up on it, it's
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:53:15PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > I suggest that you try lvmcache instead. It's much more flexible than
> > bcache,
> > does pretty much the same job, and has much less of the "hacky" feel to it.
>
> I can read up on it, it's going to be a big pain to convert from o
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:41:48AM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:12:56 -0800
> Marc MERLIN wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:32:33PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > > Don't pop the champagne just yet, I just read that apprently 4.14 broke
> > > bcache for some peo
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:12:56 -0800
Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:32:33PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > Don't pop the champagne just yet, I just read that apprently 4.14 broke
> > bcache for some people [1]. Not sure how much that affects you, but it might
> > well make thi
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:45:51PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 06:27:44PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > On 11/16/17 18:07, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > > Sorry, was missing the kernel number in the subject, just fixed that.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:04:45AM -08
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:32:33PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> Don't pop the champagne just yet, I just read that apprently 4.14 broke
> bcache for some people [1]. Not sure how much that affects you, but it might
> well make things worse. Yeah, I know, wonderful.
Oh my, that's actually pret
On 11/16/17 22:45, Marc MERLIN wrote:
(snip)
>> This BUG() was recently removed and seems to be caused by some kind
>> of persistent corruption, which is seen as invalid inline extent.
>> See [1], [2] for details. Maybe you can backport them?
>> Alternatively just give 4.14 a whirl, it's great.
>>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 06:27:44PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 11/16/17 18:07, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > Sorry, was missing the kernel number in the subject, just fixed that.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:04:45AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> >> My server now reboots every 20mn or so, wit
On 11/16/17 18:07, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> Sorry, was missing the kernel number in the subject, just fixed that.
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:04:45AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> My server now reboots every 20mn or so, with this.
>> Sadly another BUG_ON() and it won't even tell me which filesystem
nt_inline_ref, offset);
> BUG();
> return 0;
> }
>
>
>
> [ 1399.728735] --------[ cut here ]
> [ 1399.744149] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:1802!
> [ 1399.759400] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 1399.774892] Modules linked in: veth ip6table_filter ip
urn sizeof(struct btrfs_extent_data_ref) +
offsetof(struct btrfs_extent_inline_ref, offset);
BUG();
return 0;
}
[ 1399.728735] [ cut here ]
[ 1399.744149] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:1802!
[ 1399.759400] invalid opcode: [#1] P
11 matches
Mail list logo