Note that this FS still be unmountable with last for-linus branch.
Aug 27 10:47:33 backup2 kernel: [987464.600465] device fsid
a5dfe512-c8a3-46f0-bc8c-6365b8eccdcb devid 1 transid 110425
/dev/mapper/vg--backupplug-backup
Aug 27 10:47:33 backup2 kernel: [987464.601701] btrfs: force zlib
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 04:11:47PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
On 05/08/2012 10:57, Chris Samuel wrote:
On 08/04/2012 08:41 AM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Is there something I can do to fix that ? (the mount
option recovery didn't help here)
I've seen someone (perhaps Marc Merlin)
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:45:57 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 04:11:47PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Aug 5 16:10:12 backup2 kernel: [ 58.674758] parent transid verify failed
on 615015833600 wanted 110423 found 110424
1st mirror fails verify_parent_transid().
Aug 5
On 08/04/2012 08:41 AM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Is there something I can do to fix that ? (the mount
option recovery didn't help here)
I've seen someone (perhaps Marc Merlin) report that the
3.5.x kernel was able to mount a filesystem that 3.4.x
couldn't, so it might be worth a shot here!
On 05/08/2012 10:57, Chris Samuel wrote:
On 08/04/2012 08:41 AM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Is there something I can do to fix that ? (the mount
option recovery didn't help here)
I've seen someone (perhaps Marc Merlin) report that the
3.5.x kernel was able to mount a filesystem that 3.4.x
On 02/08/2012 18:18, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
On 02/08/2012 15:53, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:41:03PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Yes... it's a copy from my /var/log/kern.log. Is it really disabled ?
I was mistaken, it really is enabled unconditionally in ctree.h:55.
On 04/08/2012 00:41, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
On 02/08/2012 18:18, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
On 02/08/2012 15:53, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:41:03PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Yes... it's a copy from my /var/log/kern.log. Is it really disabled ?
I was mistaken, it really
On 02/08/2012 15:22, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:48:15PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
I have some trouble with a btrfs filesystem.
As you can see in logs, there is lines which are from btrfs (I
supposed), then some warnings at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, and finally a
kernel
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:41:03PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Yes... it's a copy from my /var/log/kern.log. Is it really disabled ?
I was mistaken, it really is enabled unconditionally in ctree.h:55.
Josef says that the V0 extent refs are not used for a long time, so the
question is how did
On 02/08/2012 15:53, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:41:03PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Yes... it's a copy from my /var/log/kern.log. Is it really disabled ?
I was mistaken, it really is enabled unconditionally in ctree.h:55.
Josef says that the V0 extent refs are not used
Hi,
I have some trouble with a btrfs filesystem.
As you can see in logs, there is lines which are from btrfs (I supposed), then
some warnings at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, and finally a kernel BUG at
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5038.
Do you need more informations ?
Aug 1 21:23:10 backup2 kernel: [
11 matches
Mail list logo
