On 05/30/2011 07:12 AM, Elric Milon wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2011 21:51:57 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/23/2011 07:57 AM, Elric Milon wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011 18:28:49 you wrote:
On 05/16/2011 11:01 AM, Whirm wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011 16:11:19 Josef Bacik wrote:
Sorry yes, I meant this
On Monday 16 May 2011 18:28:49 you wrote:
On 05/16/2011 11:01 AM, Whirm wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011 16:11:19 Josef Bacik wrote:
Sorry yes, I meant this is how I managed to get the corrupted filesystem.
Ill try to break it again.
Oh ok perfect, yeah I will try and do the same sort
On 05/23/2011 07:57 AM, Elric Milon wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011 18:28:49 you wrote:
On 05/16/2011 11:01 AM, Whirm wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011 16:11:19 Josef Bacik wrote:
Sorry yes, I meant this is how I managed to get the corrupted filesystem.
Ill try to break it again.
Oh ok perfect,
On Friday 13 May 2011 20:52:22 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/13/2011 01:19 PM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2011 20:57:17 Josef Bacik wrote:
[..]
It doesn't look like that bit had my debugging output. Thanks,
Josef
Looks like the last message I sent didn't make to the
On 05/16/2011 05:17 AM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2011 20:52:22 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/13/2011 01:19 PM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2011 20:57:17 Josef Bacik wrote:
[..]
It doesn't look like that bit had my debugging output. Thanks,
Josef
Looks like the last
On Monday 16 May 2011 16:11:19 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/16/2011 05:17 AM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2011 20:52:22 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/13/2011 01:19 PM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2011 20:57:17 Josef Bacik wrote:
[..]
It doesn't look like that bit had my
On 05/16/2011 11:01 AM, Whirm wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011 16:11:19 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/16/2011 05:17 AM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2011 20:52:22 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/13/2011 01:19 PM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2011 20:57:17 Josef Bacik wrote:
[..]
It
On Thursday 05 May 2011 20:57:17 Josef Bacik wrote:
[..]
It doesn't look like that bit had my debugging output. Thanks,
Josef
Looks like the last message I sent didn't make to the list. Here's the link to
the debug log:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=fnfsnVZS
Thanks,
--
Elric Milon
--
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:12:03PM +0200, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
Seems like the mail didn't get trough, trying again with the logfile
compressed.
Thanks,
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 20:21:54 you wrote:
[...]
Argh sorry I was looking at the wrong part of that warning. Can you run
with
On 05/05/2011 01:54 PM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2011 19:53:52 Josef Bacik wrote:
[...]
Hmm I didn't see what I needed, can you do it again and try to get kernel
messages to go to /var/log/messages so you don't have to worry about the
log buffer? The other option is to setup
On 05/04/2011 10:26 AM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a traceback from a failed attempt to mount a btrfs in lvm in luks
filesystem.
Note that if I mount it readonly it mounts successfully (haven't tried to
recover any data as I have recent backups).
Yesterday I defragmented both / and
On 05/04/2011 01:43 PM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 16:46:44 Josef Bacik wrote:
On 05/04/2011 10:26 AM, wh...@gmx.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a traceback from a failed attempt to mount a btrfs in lvm in luks
filesystem.
Note that if I mount it readonly it mounts successfully
12 matches
Mail list logo
