Goffredo Baroncelli, Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:24:57 +0100:
> On 02/09/2011 09:12 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100:
>>
>>> On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
> On 02/08/2011 07:
On 02/09/2011 09:12 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
> Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100:
>
>> On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
>>>
On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting t
Hallo, Lubos,
Du meintest am 10.02.11:
>>> /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0
> # ls -la /dev/root
> ls: cannot access /dev/root: No such file or directory
ls -la $(rdev)
(but that's no simple way ...)
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
Hallo, Lubos,
Du meintest am 09.02.11:
> # cat /proc/mounts
> rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
> /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0
"/dev/root" is a symlink (which I don't like).
rdev
shows which real device is meant.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Chris Samuel, Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:09:17 +1100:
> On 10/02/11 07:12, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>
>> /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0
>
> My memory of the strace showed that there was no /dev/root when it tried
> to open it - can you confirm whether or not that's the case please ?
>
> che
On 10/02/11 07:12, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
> /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0
My memory of the strace showed that there was no /dev/root
when it tried to open it - can you confirm whether or not
that's the case please ?
cheers!
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Me
Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100:
> On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
>>
>>> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with
On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
> Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
>
>> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with
>>> loop, encryption etc.
>>>
>>> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5
>>>
>
Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with
>> loop, encryption etc.
>>
>> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5
>>
>> WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIME
On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with
> loop, encryption etc.
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5
>
> WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
> WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
Hi,
I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with
loop, encryption etc.
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
error checking /dev/sda5 mount status
Is there something I ca
11 matches
Mail list logo