Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-10 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Goffredo Baroncelli, Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:24:57 +0100: > On 02/09/2011 09:12 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >> Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100: >> >>> On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100: > On 02/08/2011 07:

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-10 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 02/09/2011 09:12 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100: > >> On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >>> Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100: >>> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm hitting t

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-09 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Lubos, Du meintest am 10.02.11: >>> /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0 > # ls -la /dev/root > ls: cannot access /dev/root: No such file or directory ls -la $(rdev) (but that's no simple way ...) Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-09 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Lubos, Du meintest am 09.02.11: > # cat /proc/mounts > rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 > /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0 "/dev/root" is a symlink (which I don't like). rdev shows which real device is meant. Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-09 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Chris Samuel, Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:09:17 +1100: > On 10/02/11 07:12, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > >> /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0 > > My memory of the strace showed that there was no /dev/root when it tried > to open it - can you confirm whether or not that's the case please ? > > che

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-09 Thread Chris Samuel
On 10/02/11 07:12, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0 My memory of the strace showed that there was no /dev/root when it tried to open it - can you confirm whether or not that's the case please ? cheers! Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Me

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-09 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100: > On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >> Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100: >> >>> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Hi, I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-09 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100: > >> On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with >>> loop, encryption etc. >>> >>> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 >>> >

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-08 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100: > On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with >> loop, encryption etc. >> >> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 >> >> WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIME

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-08 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with > loop, encryption etc. > > # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 > > WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL > WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using

mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-07 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Hi, I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with loop, encryption etc. # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using error checking /dev/sda5 mount status Is there something I ca