parent transid verify failed

): has skinny extents May 11 07:58:33 [kernel] BTRFS error (device dm-3): parent transid verify failed on 541635395584 wanted 10388 found 10385 This is the last part of btrfs check --repair (I know, highly experimental, but I didn't get an alternative solution on #btrfs) : rent transid verify failed

Re: "parent transid verify failed" out of blue sky

trfsck --mode=lowmem from current Tumbleweed snapshot runs for half an hour now with never-ending same message. Would you please provide the size of the fs? lowmem mode is indeed slow, as it doesn't use much memory so it will do tons of tree search instead, which will cause tons of same "pare

"parent transid verify failed" out of blue sky

This is VM under QEMU/KVM running openSUSE Tumbleweed. I boot it infrequently for short time to test something. Last time it installed quite a lot of updates including kernel (I think 4.9.11 was the last version); I do not remember whether I rebooted it after that. Today I booted it to check

"parent transid verify failed"

Hi I am getting some "parent transid verify failed"-errors. Is there any way to find out what's affected? Are these errors in metadata, data or both - and if they are errors in the data: How can I find out which files are affected? Regards, Tobias -- To unsubscribe from this list: sen

"Fixed", Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

0): parent transid verify > failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133 > [Sat Mar 12 20:17:10 2016] BTRFS error (device dm-0): parent transid verify > failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133 As I mentioned, the initial run of btrfsck --repair did not do anything to fix this

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 15:52:52 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > I really think you need a minute's worth of kernel messages prior to > that time stamp. There was no messages a minute, or even (from memory) many hours prior to the crash. If there was something even remotely

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:10:47 -0600 > Chris Murphy wrote: > >> I'm going to guess it's a metadata block, and the profile is single. >> Otherwise, if it were data it'd just be a corrupt file and

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:10:47 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > I'm going to guess it's a metadata block, and the profile is single. > Otherwise, if it were data it'd just be a corrupt file and you'd be > told which one is affected. And if metadata had more than one copy, >

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

:00 Roman Mamedov <r...@romanrm.net>: > Hello, > > The system was seemingly running just fine for days or weeks, then I > routinely deleted a bunch of old snapshots, and suddenly got hit with: > > [Sat Mar 12 20:17:10 2016] BTRFS error (device dm-0): parent transid verify &

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > "Blowing away" a 6TB filesystem just because some block randomly went "bad", I'm going to guess it's a metadata block, and the profile is single. Otherwise, if it were data it'd just be a corrupt file and you'd be told

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:03:54 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > With backups I'd try it, if only for the personal experience value and to > see what the result was. But that's certainly more intensive "surgery" > on the filesystem than --repair, and I'd only do it either for

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

Roman Mamedov posted on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:24:28 +0500 as excerpted: > With "Errors found in extent allocation tree", I wonder if I should try > --init-extent-tree next. With backups I'd try it, if only for the personal experience value and to see what the result was. But that's certainly

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

/lv1 UUID: 8cf8eff9-fd5a-4b6f-bb85-3f2df2f63c99 checking extents parent transid verify failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133 parent transid verify failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133 parent transid verify failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133 parent transid veri

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

Roman Mamedov posted on Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:48:47 +0500 as excerpted: > I wonder what's the best way to proceed here. Maybe try btrfs-zero-log? > But the difference between transid numbers of 6 thousands is concerning. btrfs-zero-log is a very specific tool designed to fix a very specific

Re: parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

Hello, btrfsck output: # btrfsck /dev/alpha/lv1 Checking filesystem on /dev/alpha/lv1 UUID: 8cf8eff9-fd5a-4b6f-bb85-3f2df2f63c99 checking extents parent transid verify failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133 parent transid verify failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133

parent transid verify failed on snapshot deletion

Hello, The system was seemingly running just fine for days or weeks, then I routinely deleted a bunch of old snapshots, and suddenly got hit with: [Sat Mar 12 20:17:10 2016] BTRFS error (device dm-0): parent transid verify failed on 7483566862336 wanted 410578 found 404133 [Sat Mar 12 20:17:10

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:19:41AM +, Duncan wrote: > Alistair Grant posted on Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:38:47 +1100 as excerpted: > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:25:14PM +, Duncan wrote: > > Thanks again Duncan for your assistance. > > > > I plugged the ext4 drive I planned to use for the

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

Alistair Grant posted on Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:38:47 +1100 as excerpted: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:25:14PM +, Duncan wrote: >> Alistair Grant posted on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 06:55:04 +1100 as excerpted: >> >> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:48:47PM +, Duncan wrote: >> >> Alistair Grant posted

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

Alistair Grant posted on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 06:55:04 +1100 as excerpted: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:48:47PM +, Duncan wrote: >> Alistair Grant posted on Mon, 07 Dec 2015 21:02:56 +1100 as excerpted: >> >> > I think I'll try the btrfs restore as a learning exercise, and to >> > check the

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:25:14PM +, Duncan wrote: > Alistair Grant posted on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 06:55:04 +1100 as excerpted: > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:48:47PM +, Duncan wrote: > >> Alistair Grant posted on Mon, 07 Dec 2015 21:02:56 +1100 as excerpted: > >> > >> > I think I'll try

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

Alistair Grant posted on Mon, 07 Dec 2015 21:02:56 +1100 as excerpted: > I think I'll try the btrfs restore as a learning exercise, and to check > the contents of my backup (I don't trust my memory, so something could > have changed since the last backup). Trying btrfs restore is an excellent

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

Alistair Grant posted on Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:57:15 +1100 as excerpted: > I've ran btrfs scrub and btrfsck on the drives, with the output included > below. Based on what I've found on the web, I assume that a > btrfs-zero-log is required. > > * Is this the recommended path? [Just replying to a

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:25:01AM +, Duncan wrote: > Alistair Grant posted on Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:57:15 +1100 as excerpted: > > > I've ran btrfs scrub and btrfsck on the drives, with the output included > > below. Based on what I've found on the web, I assume that a > > btrfs-zero-log is

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:48:47PM +, Duncan wrote: > Alistair Grant posted on Mon, 07 Dec 2015 21:02:56 +1100 as excerpted: > > > I think I'll try the btrfs restore as a learning exercise, and to check > > the contents of my backup (I don't trust my memory, so something could > > have

Re: Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

On 12/07/2015 02:57 PM, Alistair Grant wrote as excerpted: > Fixing recursive fault, but reboot is needed For the record: I saw the same message (incl. hard lockup) when doing a balance on a single-disk btrfs. Besides that, the fs works flawlessly (~60GB, usage: no snapshots, ~15 lxc

Fixing recursive fault and parent transid verify failed

Hi, (Resending as it looks like the first attempt didn't get through, probably too large, so logs are now in dropbox) I have a btrfs volume which is raid1 across two spinning rust disks, each 2TB. When trying to access some files from a another machine using sshfs the server machine has crashed

Re: fs unreadable after powercycle: BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922

(device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922 [ 121.861607] BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922 [ 121.861715] BTRFS: failed to read tree root on sda [ 121.878111] BTRFS: open_ctree failed btrfs-progs v4.0

fs unreadable after powercycle: BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922

Hi, after a hard reboot (powercycle) a btrfs volume did not come up again: It's a single 4TB disk - only btrfs with lzo - data=single,metadata=dup [ 121.831814] BTRFS info (device sda): disk space caching is enabled [ 121.857820] BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280

Re: fs unreadable after powercycle: BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922

[ 121.857820] BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922 [ 121.861607] BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922 [ 121.861715] BTRFS: failed to read tree root on sda [ 121.878111] BTRFS: open_ctree

Re: fs unreadable after powercycle: BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922

2015-08-08 21:05 GMT+02:00 Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk: Maybe someone can give some clues why does this happen in the first place? Is it unfortunate timing due to the abrupt power cycle? Shouldn't CoW protect against this somewhat? Not somewhat: it should protect it completely. There are

Re: fs unreadable after powercycle: BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922

[ 121.857820] BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922 [ 121.861607] BTRFS (device sda): parent transid verify failed on 427084513280 wanted 390924 found 390922 [ 121.861715] BTRFS: failed to read tree root on sda [ 121.878111] BTRFS

parent transid verify failed

I am running kernel 4.0 and btrfs-prog mainline. I have a backup. Of the following commands: btrfs check —repair device btrfsck —repair device mount -t btrfs -o recovery device mount btrfs scrub start mount --none of them remove the parent transid verify failed” errors from the disk

'parent transid verify failed' for 13637 missing transactions, resulting in 'BTRFS: Transaction aborted'

SSD devices, enabling SSD mode [ 106.578440] BTRFS: checking UUID tree [ 106.581198] parent transid verify failed on 168079851520 wanted 6329580 found 6343217 [ 106.581857] parent transid verify failed on 168079851520 wanted 6329580 found 6343217 [ 106.581880] BTRFS warning (device sda1

Unmountable filesystem parent transid verify failed

with a SEGV. Now the filesystem does not mount and none of the recovery options I have tried work. I have upgraded to Debian testing and are now using kerne3.10-2-amd64 When I try btrfsck I get heaps of these : Ignoring transid failure parent transid verify failed on 24419581267968 wanted 301480 found

Unmountable BTRFS with parent transid verify failed

with the btrfs command segfaulting. Now when I have rebooted but the filesystem does not mount. When I run btrfsck /dev/sde I get a lot of parent transid verify failed on 3539986560 wanted 301481 found 301495 parent transid verify failed on 3539986560 wanted 301481 found 301495 parent transid

Re: Unmountable BTRFS with parent transid verify failed

ronnie sahlberg posted on Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:50:36 -0700 as excerpted: And while btrfsck eventually does complete the filesystem remains unmountable. Any advice ? This isn't specific to your question, but in general... In the Question: How can I recover this partition? (unable to find

Re: Unmountable BTRFS with parent transid verify failed

On Aug 31, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: ronnie sahlberg posted on Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:50:36 -0700 as excerpted: And while btrfsck eventually does complete the filesystem remains unmountable. Any advice ? This isn't specific to your question, but in general...

Re: parent transid verify failed on -- After moving btrfs closer to the beginning of drive with dd

, thanks for the response! Here's the output of -o recovery [ 5473.725751] device label Storage devid 1 transid 116023 /dev/sdb1 [ 5473.726612] btrfs: enabling auto recovery [ 5473.726615] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 5473.734581] parent transid verify failed on 1229060423680 wanted

Re: parent transid verify failed on -- After moving btrfs closer to the beginning of drive with dd

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Jordan Windsor jorda...@gmail.com wrote: Also here's the output of btrfs-find-root: ./btrfs-find-root /dev/sdb1 Super think's the tree root is at 1229060866048, chunk root 1259695439872 Went past the fs size, exiting Not sure where to go from here. I can't

Re: parent transid verify failed on -- After moving btrfs closer to the beginning of drive with dd

On Dec 29, 2012, at 8:38 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Jordan Windsor jorda...@gmail.com wrote: Also here's the output of btrfs-find-root: ./btrfs-find-root /dev/sdb1 Super think's the tree root is at 1229060866048, chunk root 1259695439872 Went past

Re: parent transid verify failed on -- After moving btrfs closer to the beginning of drive with dd

116023 /dev/sdb1 [ 481.514277] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 481.522611] parent transid verify failed on 1229060423680 wanted 116023 found 116027 [ 481.522789] parent transid verify failed on 1229060423680 wanted 116023 found 116027 [ 481.522790] btrfs: failed to read tree root

Re: parent transid verify failed on -- After moving btrfs closer to the beginning of drive with dd

Hello, thanks for the response! Here's the output of -o recovery [ 5473.725751] device label Storage devid 1 transid 116023 /dev/sdb1 [ 5473.726612] btrfs: enabling auto recovery [ 5473.726615] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 5473.734581] parent transid verify failed on 1229060423680

Re: Recovering parent transid verify failed

Anything new? I'm still trying to fix my FS every once in a while, none of the tools helps. This is what find-root gives: http://pastebin.com/KycgzhaP Btrfsck still only gives this: # sudo ./btrfsck --repair /dev/sda4 enabling repair mode parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted

Re: corrupted btrfs volume: parent transid verify failed

Regarding your backup regimen, consider using rsync instead of dd: after the initial backup, rsync can update the existing backup _much_ more quickly, making it practical to do a backup every night, or even multiple times a day. dd also has the downside of potentially _really_ confusing

Re: corrupted btrfs volume: parent transid verify failed

/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git and http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git -b integration-20110805, but when running sudo ./btrfsck -s 1 /dev/mapper/home from either repo builds, I receive the error parent transid verify failed on 647363842048 wanted 210333 found 210302 (repeated

Re: corrupted btrfs volume: parent transid verify failed

the error parent transid verify failed on 647363842048 wanted 210333 found 210302 (repeated 3x).  I've also tried the flags -s 0, -s 1, and -s 2, all with the same results. Is there something in the log about replaying log? If yes, try btrfs-zero-log https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php

Re: corrupted btrfs volume: parent transid verify failed

Fajar, Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, running sudo ./btrfs-zero-log /dev/mapper/home results in the same parent transid verify failed on 647363842048 wanted 210333 found 210302 errors, repeated 3 times. I am running Arch Linux with the latest 3.0.1 kernel on a x86_64 machine

Re: corrupted btrfs volume: parent transid verify failed

, as I keep receiving the same parent transid verify failed messages. Will be released btrfsck tool handle this case? On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: On 08/14/2011 04:13 PM, Yalonda Gishtaka wrote: I'm quite desperate to recover this volume. You

Re: corrupted btrfs volume: parent transid verify failed

Telling someone (that has a ~2 week stale backup) that they should have kept backups is hardly constructive. We're all aware there's no official btrfs repair tool. But it appears there has been been some hard, dedicated work towards this that has resulted in many commits and patches. I'm here

Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:01:53PM +0200, Francesco R wrote: 2011/6/21 Daniel Witzel dannyboy48...@gmail.com: Welcome to the club, I have a similar issue. We pretty much have to wait for the fsck tool to finish being developed. If possible unhook the drives and leave them be until the

Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

Well, I'm patient. Rather have a fsck that works than a fsck that may thrash the FS so no 'gun to the head' on this one. Some feedback on RECENT progress would be nice. Besides your merge branch Hugo (yes I tried it still no cigar...) it's been ghost since December 2010. -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

used 41.63GB path /dev/sdb6 Btrfs v0.19-36-g70c6c10-dirty Tried btrfs-select-super -s 1 /dev/sd[ab]6, but that does not help at all. On both drives, its standard output is identical: parent transid verify failed on 576901120 wanted 70669 found 70755 btrfs-select-super

[HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

[HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726 Hi list, I've a broken btrfs filesystem to deal with can someone please help me in recover the data? The filesystem has been created a pair of years ago with 4 devices with the command at #create and is mounted

Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

Welcome to the club, I have a similar issue. We pretty much have to wait for the fsck tool to finish being developed. If possible unhook the drives and leave them be until the tool is done. I don't know when it will be done as I am not a developer, mearly a follower. -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

2011/6/21 Daniel Witzel dannyboy48...@gmail.com: Welcome to the club, I have a similar issue. We pretty much have to wait for the fsck tool to finish being developed. If possible unhook the drives and leave them be until the tool is done. I don't know when it will be done as I am not a

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

? Can you describe your setup in more detail? -chris It seems that I run into the same problem: parent transid verify failed on 32940560384 wanted 210334 found 210342 BUG: scheduling while atomic: chrome/17058/0x0002 Modules linked in: snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device

cannot mount btrfs - parent transid verify failed

] parent transid verify failed on 408626470912 wanted 24 found 111474 [ 88.596686] parent transid verify failed on 408626470912 wanted 24 found 111474 [ 88.600062] parent transid verify failed on 408626470912 wanted 24 found 111474 [ 88.600067] parent transid verify failed

Having parent transid verify failed

Hello, I have a 5.5TB Btrfs filesystem on top of a md-raid 5 device. Now if i run some file operations like find, i get these messages. kernel is 2.6.38.5-1 on arch linux May 5 14:15:12 mail kernel: [13559.089713] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 May 5 14

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

? parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

Are all of the messages for this one block? parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 yes, only this block -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

operations like find, i get these messages. kernel is 2.6.38.5-1 on arch linux Are all of the messages for this one block? parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 yes, only this block Ok, what were the call traces in there? Was there an oops or a hung task

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

Excerpts from Konstantinos Skarlatos's message of 2011-05-05 10:27:30 -0400: attached you can find the whole dmesg log. I can trigger the error again if more logs are needed Yes, I'll send you a patch to get rid of the printk for the transid failed message. That way we can get a clean view of

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

On 5/5/2011 6:06 μμ, Chris Mason wrote: Excerpts from Konstantinos Skarlatos's message of 2011-05-05 10:27:30 -0400: attached you can find the whole dmesg log. I can trigger the error again if more logs are needed Yes, I'll send you a patch to get rid of the printk for the transid failed

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

4c 89 7d f8 48 8b 76 30 83 42 1c 01 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 16 00 00 48 01 f0 2011 May 5 23:32:53 mail [ 200.583376] CR2: 0030 here is the part of dmesg that does not contain the thousands of parent transid verify failed messages May 5 23:32:51 mail kernel: [ 198.371084] parent

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

of dmesg that does not contain the thousands of parent transid verify failed messages May 5 23:32:51 mail kernel: [ 198.371084] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 May 5 23:32:51 mail kernel: [ 198.371204] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

16 00 00 48 01 f0 2011 May 5 23:32:53 mail [ 200.583376] CR2: 0030 here is the part of dmesg that does not contain the thousands of parent transid verify failed messages May 5 23:32:51 mail kernel: [ 198.371084] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

Excerpts from Konstantinos Skarlatos's message of 2011-05-05 17:04:00 -0400: On 5/5/2011 11:32 μμ, Chris Mason wrote: Excerpts from Konstantinos Skarlatos's message of 2011-05-05 16:27:54 -0400: I think i made some progress. When i tried to remove the directory that i suspect contains the

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

Chris Mason wrote: We've had trouble in the past with block dev flushing code kicking in as devices are resized. Might this be the problem with my root node? I wish my problem was in only one directory. :) //Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the

Re: Having parent transid verify failed

On 6/5/2011 2:50 πμ, Chris Mason wrote: Excerpts from Konstantinos Skarlatos's message of 2011-05-05 17:04:00 -0400: On 5/5/2011 11:32 μμ, Chris Mason wrote: Excerpts from Konstantinos Skarlatos's message of 2011-05-05 16:27:54 -0400: I think i made some progress. When i tried to remove the

Recovering parent transid verify failed

Hi, I'm having the same issues as previously mentioned. Apparently the new fsck tool will be able to recover this? Few questions, is there a GIT version I can compile and use already for this? If not, is there any indication of when this will be released? --- Luke Sheldrick e:

Re: Recovering parent transid verify failed

Excerpts from Luke Sheldrick's message of 2011-03-23 14:12:45 -0400: Hi, I'm having the same issues as previously mentioned. Apparently the new fsck tool will be able to recover this? Few questions, is there a GIT version I can compile and use already for this? If not, is there any

Re: Recovering parent transid verify failed

: [105252.779080] device fsid d14e78a602757297-bf762d859b406ca9 devid 1 transid 135714 /dev/sda4 [105252.818697] parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713 [snip] Should I wait for btrfsck to be ready? Yes. Am I not using it correctly now? No, there's

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

let me know. -chris $ btrfsck -s 1 /dev/sda using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864 parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528 wanted 39651 found 39649 btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed. Aborted $ btrfsck -s 2 /dev/sda using SB copy

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

, bytenr 67108864 parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528 wanted 39651 found 39649 btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed. Aborted $ btrfsck -s 2 /dev/sda using SB copy 2, bytenr 274877906944 parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

On Fr, 10.12.10 15:11 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote: What would be the steps to get it mounted? If btrfsck -s is able to find a good super, I've setup a tool that will copy the good super over into the default super. It is currently sitting in the next branch of the

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

. Hello, I get those parent transid verify failed errors too after a system failure. # btrfsck -s 1 /dev/md0 using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864 found 1954912653312 bytes used err is 0 total csum bytes: 1892054684 total tree bytes: 3455627264 total fs tree bytes: 1082691584 btree space

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

Chris Mason chris.mason at oracle.com writes: [...] Build the latest tools, then: btrfsck -s 1 /dev/xxx btrfsck -s 2 /dev/xxx If either of these work we have an easy way to get it mounted. Just let me know. Hello, I get those parent transid verify failed errors too after a system

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

, bytenr 67108864 parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528 wanted 39651 found 39649 btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed. Aborted $ btrfsck -s 2 /dev/sda using SB copy 2, bytenr 274877906944 parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

Build the latest tools, then: btrfsck -s 1 /dev/xxx btrfsck -s 2 /dev/xxx If either of these work we have an easy way to get it mounted. Just let me know. -chris $ btrfsck -s 1 /dev/sda using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864 parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528 wanted 39651 found

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

Excerpts from Tommy Jonsson's message of 2010-12-01 06:00:56 -0500: Hi folks! Been using btrfs for quite a while now, worked great until now. Got power-loss on my machine and now i have the parent transid verify failed on X wanted X found X problem. So I can't get it to mount. My btrfs

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

whould happen if i just ignore/bypass the transid error? The error: [265889.197279] device fsid 734a485d12c77872-9b0b5aa408670db4 devid 3 transid 39651 /dev/sda [265889.198266] btrfs: use compression [265889.647817] parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528 wanted 39651 found 39649

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

$ btrfsck -s 1 /dev/sda using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864 parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528 wanted 39651 found 39649 btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed. Aborted $ btrfsck -s 2 /dev/sda using SB copy 2, bytenr 274877906944 parent transid verify

Re: Fsck, parent transid verify failed

Tried btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sda and btrfs-debug-tree -e /dev/sda : parent transid verify failed on 2721514774528 wanted 39651 found 39649 btrfs-debug-tree: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed. dmesg said: [268375.903581] device fsid 734a485d12c77872

Fsck, parent transid verify failed

Hi folks! Been using btrfs for quite a while now, worked great until now. Got power-loss on my machine and now i have the parent transid verify failed on X wanted X found X problem. So I can't get it to mount. My btrfs is spread over sda (2tb), sdc(2tb), sdd(1tb). Is this something

Re: parent transid verify failed, continued

contains qemu-kvm disk images in raw mode with caching mode set to writeback, the symptoms is that: * in 2.6.34 and lower, I could mount the filesystem, with the parent transid verify failed message appearing once; * with 2.6.35+ and upper, however, not anymore: I mount it and the same parent

parent transid verify failed, continued

, the symptoms is that: * in 2.6.34 and lower, I could mount the filesystem, with the parent transid verify failed message appearing once; * with 2.6.35+ and upper, however, not anymore: I mount it and the same parent transid very failed message now floods dmesg, and I cannot kill -9 any program trying

Any btrfsck to try out? [was: parent transid verify failed, continued]

transid verify failed message appearing once; * with 2.6.35+ and upper, however, not anymore: I mount it and the same parent transid very failed message now floods dmesg, and I cannot kill -9 any program trying to access that filesystem. [...] Another thing: as I can afford to recreate the hosed

parent transid verify failed

After an unclean shutdown, my btrfs is now unmountable: device label root devid 1 transid 375202 /dev/sdc4 parent transid verify failed on 53984886784 wanted 375202 found 375201 parent transid verify failed on 53984886784 wanted 375202 found 375201 parent transid verify failed on 53984886784

how can i recover the btrfs after parent transid verify failed?

fileserver kernel: [ 1229.692274] parent transid verify failed on 6975016271872 wanted 204247 found 204249 Jul 29 18:37:04 fileserver kernel: [ 1229.692287] parent transid verify failed on 6975016271872 wanted 204247 found 204249 Jul 29 18:37:04 fileserver kernel: [ 1229.696549] parent transid verify

dmesg filled with parent transid verify failed messages using Linus' HEAD as of 20100704

the filesystem (in fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:284): parent transid verify failed on 48136192 wanted 16424 found 16420 But there is something strange: * this message only appears twice when running 2.6.34; * it fills my dmesg (several tens of thousands of times a second - printk_ratelimit() triggers