On 29/06/13 10:41, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2013, Martin wrote:
>> Mmmm... I'm not sure trying to balance historical read/write counts is
>> the way to go... What happens for the use case of an SSD paired up with
>> a HDD? (For example an SSD and a similarly sized Raptor or enterprise
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013, Martin wrote:
> Mmmm... I'm not sure trying to balance historical read/write counts is
> the way to go... What happens for the use case of an SSD paired up with
> a HDD? (For example an SSD and a similarly sized Raptor or enterprise
> SCSI?...) Or even just JBODs of a mishmash
On 28/06/13 18:04, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:55:31AM -0700, George Mitchell wrote:
>> On 06/28/2013 09:25 AM, Martin wrote:
>>> On 28/06/13 16:39, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:34:18AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:59:45PM +0100
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:55:31AM -0700, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 09:25 AM, Martin wrote:
> >On 28/06/13 16:39, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:34:18AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> On kernel 3.8.13:
> >>
On 06/28/2013 09:25 AM, Martin wrote:
On 28/06/13 16:39, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:34:18AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Martin wrote:
On kernel 3.8.13:
Using two equal performance SATAII HDDs, formatted for btrfs
raid1 for both data an
On 28/06/13 16:39, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:34:18AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Martin wrote:
>>> On kernel 3.8.13:
>>>
>>> Using two equal performance SATAII HDDs, formatted for btrfs
>>> raid1 for both data and metadata and:
>>>
>
Hugo Mills posted on Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:39:10 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:34:18AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Martin wrote:
>> > On kernel 3.8.13:
>> >
>> > Using two equal performance SATAII HDDs, formatted for btrfs raid1
>> > for
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:34:18AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> > On kernel 3.8.13:
> >
> > Using two equal performance SATAII HDDs, formatted for btrfs raid1 for
> > both data and metadata and:
> >
> > The second disk appears to suffer abo
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> On kernel 3.8.13:
>
> Using two equal performance SATAII HDDs, formatted for btrfs raid1 for
> both data and metadata and:
>
> The second disk appears to suffer about x8 the read activity of the
> first disk. This causes the second disk to
On kernel 3.8.13:
Using two equal performance SATAII HDDs, formatted for btrfs raid1 for
both data and metadata and:
The second disk appears to suffer about x8 the read activity of the
first disk. This causes the second disk to quickly get maxed out whilst
the first disk remains almost idle.
Tot
10 matches
Mail list logo