Re: subvols, ro- and bind mounts - how?

On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 19:32 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > That seems due for a revision because I do rw, ro, rw, rw, ro mounts > in sequence and they stick fine. In fact they stick with the same > subvolume. > > [root@f23m ]# mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/1 -o subvol=home > [root@f23m ]# mount /dev/sda7

Re: subvols, ro- and bind mounts - how?

Hey. I'd have an additional question about subvols O:-) Given the following setup: 5 | +--root (subvol, /)    +-- mnt (dir) with the following done: - init 1 - remount,ro / (i.e. the subvol root) - mount /dev/btrfs-device /mnt (i.e. mount the top subvol at /mnt) The following happened: - / was

Re: subvols, ro- and bind mounts - how?

Hey. I'd have an additional question about subvols O:-) Given the following setup: 5 | +--root (subvol, /) +-- mnt (dir) with the following done: - init 1 - remount,ro / (i.e. the subvol root) - mount /dev/btrfs-device /mnt (i.e. mount the top subvol at /mnt) The following happened: - /

Re: subvols, ro- and bind mounts - how?

On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 23:36 +0100, S.J. wrote: > Quote: > > " Most mount options apply to the whole filesystem, and only the > options > for the first subvolume > to be mounted will take effect. This is due to lack of implementation > and may change in the future. " > > from

Re: subvols, ro- and bind mounts - how?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:36 PM, S.J. wrote: > Quote: > > " Most mount options apply to the whole filesystem, and only the options for > the first subvolume > to be mounted will take effect. This is due to lack of implementation and > may change in the future. " > > from