Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2

2010-08-05 Thread adi
Hi Miao, ok, i'll try: mkfs.ext3 /dev/sdaN »used it as root-file-system quite a while« tune2fs -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_index /dev/sdaN (converted to ext4) »used it as root file system quite another while« btrfs-convert /dev/sdaN (converted to btrfs) »used it as root filesystem with -compress

Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2

2010-08-03 Thread Miao Xie
An: Adiadalber...@gmx.de CC: liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2 Hi, Adi On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:34:24 +0200, Adi wrote: ok, i have tried the 2.6.35-rc6 kernel, as TiCPU on #btrfs suggested, but i also got an error. i don't think it has

Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2

2010-07-31 Thread Adi
ok, i have tried the 2.6.35-rc6 kernel, as TiCPU on #btrfs suggested, but i also got an error. i don't think it has something to do with kcrypt, as i can mount another partition without any problems. hm, and btw, that dump was made on another pc. here is a dmesg-dump:

Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2

2010-07-30 Thread Adi
hi, i used a current stable gentoo with a 2.6.34-r2 gentoo-kernel. the btrfs filesystem is on a lvm, which is on a luks-partition. i think i corrupted the filesystem with a 2.6.34 tuxonice kernel, witch ran fine without suspend-to-disk, but after suspending i couldn't reboot anymore. this debug

wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2

2010-07-29 Thread Adi
hi, i have a problem with mounting a btrfspartition. i think it corrupted somehow. btrfsck also didn't work. here is the demesg output, if i try to btrfsck it: *** device-mapper: ioctl: unable to remove open device temporary-cryptsetup-2466 device fsid

Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2

2010-07-29 Thread liubo
On 07/29/2010 09:11 PM, Adi wrote: hi, i have a problem with mounting a btrfspartition. i think it corrupted somehow. btrfsck also didn't work. here is the demesg output, if i try to btrfsck it: Hi, Adi can you give us some steps with which the bug can be reproduced? Thanks, liubo