Hi,
this time I've hit a new bug. This happened while ceph was rebuilding
his filestore (heavy io).
The btrfs version is from 3.2-rc1, applied to a 3.0 kernel.
Regards,
Christian
[28981.550478] [ cut here ]
[28981.555625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1587!
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 06:59:14PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
I have a fs that started with the default policy of metadata=dup. I
added a second device and rebalanced, and so the metadata chunks were
converted to raid1. Now I can not remove the second device because
raid1 requires at least
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:21:00PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:32:48PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Instead of preventing the removal of devices that would render existing
raid10 or raid1 impossible, warn but go ahead with it; the rebalancing
code is smart enough
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 07:43:07PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:40:56PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
clustered allocation allocated lots of unnecessary metadata block
groups. It's also useful to
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 07:43:07PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:40:56PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Experimental patch to be able to compact only the metadata after
clustered allocation allocated lots
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 05:12:13PM -0500, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
I have a couple of questions concerning btrfs reliability.
I'm currently using btrfs in my internal drives (strong advantages) and have
used it on external drives, but I've recently migrated the external ones to
ext4, for
When doing the io_ctl helpers to clean up the free space cache stuff I stopped
using our normal prepare_pages stuff, which means I of course forgot to do
things like set the pages extent mapped, which will cause us all sorts of
wonderful propblems. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
On 11/15/2011 4:22 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Restriper won't let you do raid1 - dup transition because dup is only
allowed for a single-spindle FS, so you'll end up with error btrfs:
unable to start restripe
There is no way to prioritize disks during restripe. To get dup back
you'll have
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:14AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
On 11/15/2011 4:22 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Restriper won't let you do raid1 - dup transition because dup is only
allowed for a single-spindle FS, so you'll end up with error btrfs:
unable to start restripe
There is no way
On 10/27/2011 11:27 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've pulled in Hugo's integration tree, minus the features that were not
yet in the kernel. This also has a few small commits that I had queued
up outside of the fsck work.
Hugo, many thanks for keeping up the integration tree! Taking
Hi Wu Bo,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:09:00AM +0800, WuBo wrote:
This test is for preallocation test. If the disk is full, just with a prealloc
file has some free space that prealloc early. We need to check whether the
write
to the free space is success or not.
Signed-off-by: Wu Bo
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:13:43PM +0100, Stefan Kleijkers wrote:
Hello Josef,
We have patched the 3.1.1 kernel with your patch and after a short
time one of the ceph osds crashed (core dumped) and I found this in
the dmesg, please let me know if that's enough information or if you
need
Hello Josef,
We have patched the 3.1.1 kernel with your patch and after a short time
one of the ceph osds crashed (core dumped) and I found this in the
dmesg, please let me know if that's enough information or if you need more.
Stefan
[11226.207447] [ cut here ]
Hey Chris,
Here are the cluster rework patches from Alexandre along with my tracepoints
patch and a couple of bugfixes. This should fix the panics we've been seeing
when running xfstests 13 in a loop. The cluster fixes I've been testing for a
while, and the tracepoints patch I used to profile
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:37:13AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:21:00PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:32:48PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Instead of preventing the removal of devices that would render existing
raid10 or raid1 impossible,
On 11/16/2011 03:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:21:13PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
Hi Wu Bo,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:09:00AM +0800, WuBo wrote:
This test is for preallocation test. If the disk is full, just with a
prealloc
file has some free space that prealloc
On Nov 15, 2011, Ilya Dryomov idryo...@gmail.com wrote:
And the exact command to mimic your patch is
btrfs fi restripe start -m mount point
Thanks. I wasn't aware of the restripe patch when I wrote this Quick
Hack (TM).
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighterhttp://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You
setup_cluster_no_bitmap() searches all the extents and bitmaps starting
from offset. Therefore if it returns -ENOSPC, all the bitmaps starting
from offset are in the bitmaps list, so it's sufficient to search from
this list in setup_cluser_bitmap().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
