Hi, i have some questions when using Btrfs on multi-devices:
1. a large file will always be stored wholely on a device or it may
spread on some devices/partitions? Btrfs has option to specify it
explicitly?
2. suppose i have a directory tree like that:
Dir_1
|-- file_1A
|-- file_1B
|-- Dir_2
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Chu Duc Minh chu.ducm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, i have some questions when using Btrfs on multi-devices:
1. a large file will always be stored wholely on a device or it may
spread on some devices/partitions?
IIRC:
- in raid1 mode, it will be written on all disks
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:56:10PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Chu Duc Minh chu.ducm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, i have some questions when using Btrfs on multi-devices:
1. a large file will always be stored wholely on a device or it may
spread on some
Fix that when scrub tries to repair an I/O or checksum error and one of
the devices containing the mirror is missing, it crashes in bio_add_page
because the bdev is a NULL pointer for missing devices.
Reported-by: Marco L. Crociani marco.croci...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens
I ran cppcheck on btrfs and it looks like it says there could be a few
cosmetic changes, such as reducing the scope of some variables. I'm
guessing that it won't be too terrible if I do make the changes, but
where do I submit the code when I'm done?
P.S. This is my first kernel project, so
On Wednesday 02 of May 2012 19:36:29 David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:42:16PM +0200, Hubert Kario wrote:
I'm not sure if this is useful and sensible usecase, clearing superblock
is a one-time action anyway, so it's more for the sake of tool
flexibility.
Clearing
On Thursday 03 of May 2012 09:06:31 Josh Marshall wrote:
I ran cppcheck on btrfs and it looks like it says there could be a few
cosmetic changes, such as reducing the scope of some variables. I'm
guessing that it won't be too terrible if I do make the changes, but
where do I submit the code
On Wednesday 02 of May 2012 18:33:37 David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:09:21PM +0200, Hubert Kario wrote:
Let me rephrase it:
People don't want to be able to do:
mount /dev/lvm/btrfs /mnt/a -t btrfs -o subvol=volA
mount /dev/lvm/btrfs /mnt/b -t btrfs -o subvol=volB
cp
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Ahmet Inan
ai...@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:26:19PM +0200, Ahmet Inan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Ahmet Inan
ai...@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Fix control flow to store count before breaking loop.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman dan...@quora.org
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index e801f22..2227420 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++
Fix the size members of btrfs_ioctl_ino_path_args and
btrfs_ioctl_logical_ino_args. The user space btrfs-progs utilities used
__u64 and the kernel headers used __u32 before.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Block abloc...@googlemail.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+),
David Sterba wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:49:41AM +0100, Timo Witte wrote:
What happened to the hot data tracking feature in btrfs? There are a lot
of old patches from aug 2010, but it looks like the feature has been
completly removed from the current version of btrfs. Is this feature
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:02:08PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Am 24. April 2012 18:26 schrieb Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to
On 3 May 2012 22:04, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:44:49PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Fix control flow to store count before breaking loop.
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg10483.html
but it's a dead code anyway.
Noted.
Chris, is
On 05/01/2012 10:41 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 05/01/2012 10:00 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:24:30PM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 04/11/2012 01:09 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:39:14PM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I hit this BUG today.
I'm running
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:44:49PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Fix control flow to store count before breaking loop.
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg10483.html
but it's a dead code anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
Hey,
When I try to mount my Btrfs filesystem it fails and this shows up on dmesg:
device fsid 97727502-a678-4ed1-a96c-409b852d76bf devid 1 transid
135714 /dev/sda4
btrfs: enabling auto recoveryparent transid verify failed on
216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
parent transid verify failed on
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:17:43AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:13:55 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:02:08PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Am 24. April 2012 18:26 schrieb Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Josef
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:18:01PM +, Yo'av Moshe wrote:
Hey,
When I try to mount my Btrfs filesystem it fails and this shows up on dmesg:
device fsid 97727502-a678-4ed1-a96c-409b852d76bf devid 1 transid
135714 /dev/sda4
btrfs: enabling auto recoveryparent transid verify failed on
On 05/03/2012 08:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:43:32AM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 05/01/2012 10:41 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 05/01/2012 10:00 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:24:30PM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 04/11/2012 01:09 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:46:15AM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 05/03/2012 08:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:43:32AM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 05/01/2012 10:41 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 05/01/2012 10:00 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:24:30PM -0600, Jim
On Thu, 3 May 2012 11:20:53 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:17:43AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:13:55 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:02:08PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Am 24. April 2012
On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:13:55 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:02:08PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Am 24. April 2012 18:26 schrieb Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Christian
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Stefan Behrens
sbehr...@giantdisaster.de wrote:
Fix that when scrub tries to repair an I/O or checksum error and one of
the devices containing the mirror is missing, it crashes in bio_add_page
because the bdev is a NULL pointer for missing devices.
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:38:27AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2012 11:20:53 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:17:43AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:13:55 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at
On Thursday 03 of May 2012 15:09:25 Waxhead wrote:
David Sterba wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:49:41AM +0100, Timo Witte wrote:
What happened to the hot data tracking feature in btrfs? There are a lot
of old patches from aug 2010, but it looks like the feature has been
completly
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:08:35PM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On 05.04.2012 22:09, Mark Fasheh wrote:
Teach tree-log.c about extended inode refs. In particular, we have to adjust
the behavior of inode ref replay as well as log tree recovery to account for
the existence of extended refs.
I think I have some failing hard drives, they are disconnected for now.
stan {~} root# btrfs filesystem show
Label: none uuid: d71404d4-468e-47d5-8f06-3b65fa7776aa
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 6.27GB
devid1 size 9.31GB used 8.16GB path /dev/sde6
*** Some devices
28 matches
Mail list logo
