Martin Steigerwald posted on Thu, 23 May 2013 18:08:35 +0200 as excerpted:
Am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, 13:19:31 schrieb Martin:
Yep, ReiserFS has stood the test of time very well and I'm still using
and abusing it still on various servers all the way from something like
a decade ago!
Very
Hello Chris,
On 05/23/2013 10:33 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
But I was using 8 drives. I'll try with 12.
My benchmarks were on flash, so the rmw I was seeing may not have had as
big an impact.
I just further played with it and simply introduced a requeue in
raid56_rmw_stripe() if the rbio is
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:08:42AM +0200, Holger Fischer wrote:
Dear BTRFS-Community,
attached is a patch that probably could be applied upstream:
It is ... Fixing unaligned memory accesses ...
Details to this patch could be read under
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656955
Quoting Bernd Schubert (2013-05-24 04:35:37)
Hello Chris,
On 05/23/2013 10:33 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
But I was using 8 drives. I'll try with 12.
My benchmarks were on flash, so the rmw I was seeing may not have had as
big an impact.
I just further played with it and simply
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:28:28AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
+static noinline int fill_data(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 len,
+ char **cur_buffer)
+{
+ struct page *page;
+ void *addr;
+ char *buffer;
+ pgoff_t index;
+ pgoff_t last_index;
From: Koen De Wit koen.de@oracle.com
# Tests file clone functionality of btrfs (reflinks) on directory trees.
# - Create directory and subdirectory, each having one file
# - Create 2 recursive reflinked copies of the tree
# - Modify the original files
# - Modify one of the copies
From: Koen De Wit koen.de@oracle.com
# Tests file clone functionality of btrfs (reflinks):
# - Reflink a file
# - Reflink the reflinked file
# - Modify the original file
# - Modify the reflinked file
[sandeen: add helpers, make several mostly-cosmetic
changes to the original
Hey David, thanks again for the review! Comments are inline below.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 04:05:36PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:28:28AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
+static noinline int fill_data(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 len,
+ char
+#define BTRFS_MAX_DEDUPE_LEN (16 * 1024 * 1024)
+#define BTRFS_ONE_DEDUPE_LEN (1 * 1024 * 1024)
+
+static long btrfs_ioctl_file_extent_same(struct file *file,
+void __user *argp)
+{
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_same_args *args;
+ struct
Hello list,
I just got myself a new SSD and decided to install yet another time
btrfs with ubuntu 13.04. I would like to ask if you suggest anything
for recommended options for mount on Crucial S4 SSD.
At the moment I am using:
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,ssd,subvol=@home
Anything else someone
At the moment I am using:
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,ssd,subvol=@home
No need to specify ssd, it's automatically detected.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 24 May 2013 21:07, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
No need to specify ssd, it's automatically detected.
I'm not so sure it did detected. When I manually set it I saw
significant improvement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
Sure. Actually, you got me thinking about some sanity checks... I need to
add at least this check:
if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
return -EROFS;
which isn't in there as of now.
It's not needed
Le sam. 25 mai 2013 00:38:27 CEST, Mark Fasheh a écrit :
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
Sure. Actually, you got me thinking about some sanity checks... I need to
add at least this check:
if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
return -EROFS;
Leonidas Spyropoulos posted on Fri, 24 May 2013 23:38:17 +0100 as
excerpted:
On 24 May 2013 21:07, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
No need to specify ssd, it's automatically detected.
I'm not so sure it did detected. When I manually set it I saw
significant improvement.
Without going back
15 matches
Mail list logo
