good catch.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
On 06/30/2013 07:51 PM, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
The uuid_unparse() call in btrfs_scan_one_device() was
a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
---
volumes.c |2 --
1 file changed, 2
Shridhar Daithankar posted on Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:20:19 +0530 as
excerpted:
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 01:53:48 PM Garry T. Williams wrote:
[discussing fragmentation]
~/.kde/share/apps/nepomuk/repository/main/data/virtuosobackend
damn!
# filefrag soprano-virtuoso.db soprano-virtuoso.db:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:01:17PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:02:10PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 07:22:00AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:25:05AM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On 30.06.2013 05:17, Josef Bacik wrote:
We
On lör, 2013-06-29 at 03:08 -0600, cwillu wrote:
Not sure I entirely follow: mounting with -o degraded (not -o
recovery) is how you're supposed to mount if there's a disk missing.
What I'm wondering about is why btrfsck segfaults, why it won't claim
which drive is supposedly corrupt in a
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:17:54PM -0400, Zach Brown wrote:
Hi gang,
I finally sat down to fix that readdir hang that has been in the back
of my mind for a while. I *hope* that the fix is pretty simple: just
don't manufacture a fake f_pos, I *think* we can abuse f_version as an
indicator
Quoting Josef Bacik (2013-07-01 08:54:35)
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:17:54PM -0400, Zach Brown wrote:
Hi gang,
I finally sat down to fix that readdir hang that has been in the back
of my mind for a while. I *hope* that the fix is pretty simple: just
don't manufacture a fake f_pos, I
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
There's been a parallel effort to incorporate a general set of lz4
patches in the kernel.
I see these patches are currently queued up in the linux-next tree, so
we may see them in the 3.11 kernel.
It looks
Lets try and be consistent with every other alloc() type function.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 26 +++---
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 7921e1d..32e30ad
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:30:43AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Lets try and be consistent with every other alloc() type function.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
Ignore this, I didn't compile it and I should have, and I'm just going to delete
this function anyway. Thanks,
Josef
For partial extents, snapshot-aware defrag does not work as expected,
since
a) we use the wrong logical offset to search for parents, which should be
disk_bytenr + extent_offset, not just disk_bytenr,
b) 'offset' returned by the backref walking just refers to key.offset, not
the 'offset'
This is actually from Zach Brown's idea.
Instead of ulist of array+rbtree, here we introduce ulist of list+rbtree,
memory is dynamic allocation and we can get rid of memory re-allocation dance
and special care for rbtree node's insert/delete for inline array, so it's
straightforward and simple.
This testscript creates reflinks to files on different subvolumes,
overwrites the original files and reflinks, and moves reflinked files
between subvolumes.
Originally submitted as testcase 302, changes are made based on comments
from Eric:
Hello Liu,
This is actually from Zach Brown's idea.
Instead of ulist of array+rbtree, here we introduce ulist of list+rbtree,
memory is dynamic allocation and we can get rid of memory re-allocation dance
and special care for rbtree node's insert/delete for inline array, so it's
Thanks Eric for reviewing and improving testcases btrfs/306, 309, 310
and 311 !
I had just one comment: on line 70 the output was redirected to
$seqres.fll instead of $seqres.full. Corrected patch below.
# Check if creating a sparse copy (reflink) of a file on btrfs
# expectedly fails when
code. It's all lightly tested with xfstests but it wouldn't surprise
me if I missed something so review is appreciated.
*mmm, hmmm*
One of these patches is making new entries not show up in readdir. This was
discovered while running stress.sh overnight, it complained about files not
On Monday, July 01, 2013 09:10:41 AM Duncan wrote:
But in general, how to find out most fragmented files and folders?
mouting with autodefrag is a serious degradation..
It is? AFAIK, all the autodefrag mount option does is scan files for
fragmentation as they are written and queue any
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 09:55:26AM +0200, Stefan Paletta wrote:
This gives EXDEV for clone operations that btrfs could otherwise execute and
with slight change of circumstances will actually execute fine.
Imagine we have a btrfs on /dev/mapper/foobar with subvols /foo and /bar.
Let’s also
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:13:26PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
For partial extents, snapshot-aware defrag does not work as expected,
since
a) we use the wrong logical offset to search for parents, which should be
disk_bytenr + extent_offset, not just disk_bytenr,
b) 'offset' returned by the
Previously we held the tree mod lock when adding stuff because we use it to
check and see if we truly do want to track tree modifications. This is
admirable, but GFP_ATOMIC in a critical area that is going to get hit pretty
hard and often is not nice. So instead do our basic checks to see if we
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:19:21PM +0200, Koen De Wit wrote:
This testscript creates reflinks to files on different subvolumes,
overwrites the original files and reflinks, and moves reflinked files
between subvolumes.
Originally submitted as testcase 302, changes are made based on comments
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:58:44PM +0200, Koen De Wit wrote:
Thanks Eric for reviewing and improving testcases btrfs/306, 309, 310 and
311 !
I had just one comment: on line 70 the output was redirected to $seqres.fll
instead of $seqres.full. Corrected patch below.
# Check if creating a
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:14:44PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
This is actually from Zach Brown's idea.
Thanks for giving this a try.
Instead of ulist of array+rbtree, here we introduce ulist of list+rbtree,
memory is dynamic allocation and we can get rid of memory re-allocation dance
and special
Sirs,
my recently slowing file system is now going read only after trying a
defrag or other operation. I'm wondering whether this is the result of
a hardware failure or a btrfs or some other issue. Output of dmesg:
127.750401] DR0: DR1: DR2:
23 matches
Mail list logo
