On 11/18/2018 03:56 PM, Stephan Olbrich wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2018, 01:30:14 CET schrieb Qu Wenruo:
Late on I got the same errors for my /home partition (on the same drive)
as well. I have snapshots of all partitions on another drive made by
btrbk. To get a working system, I made
Hello,
My name is ms. Reem Al-Hashimi. The UAE minister of state for international
cooparation. I got your contact from a certain email database from your country
while i was looking for someone to handle a huge financial transaction for me
in confidence. Can you receive and invest on behalf
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 08:48 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> On 2018/11/19 上午3:37, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>
> You haven't post btrfs check --readonly output, thus not helpful.
The oldest `btrfs check --readonly' output I saved is from 29th October with a
vanilla linux 4.19.0 kernel. Filename:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:30:28PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static inline void __bio_advance_iter(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter
> > *iter,
> > + unsigned bytes, bool mp)
>
> I think these magic 'bool np' arguments and wrappers over wrapper
> don't
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 08:10:14PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/18/18 7:23 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:13:05PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> -#define bvec_iter_page(bvec, iter) \
> >>> +#define mp_bvec_iter_page(bvec, iter)
On 2018/11/19 上午11:29, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 08:48 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>> On 2018/11/19 上午3:37, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>>
>> You haven't post btrfs check --readonly output, thus not helpful.
>
> The oldest `btrfs check --readonly' output I saved is from
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 13:00 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> May I ask for the oldest kernel ran on the fs?
Looks like the first kernel on the host is 3.12.2.
> To make it clear again, any --init-* should only be used when you're
> completely sure what is going to happen (at code level).
Copy.
>
>
On 2018/11/19 下午1:23, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 13:00 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> May I ask for the oldest kernel ran on the fs?
> Looks like the first kernel on the host is 3.12.2.
OK, then it makes sense for such strange dir ref corruption.
>
>> To make it clear
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:20:28PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:52:50PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > First it is more efficient to use bio_for_each_bvec() in both
> > blk_bio_segment_split() and __blk_recalc_rq_segments() to compute how
> > many multi-page bvecs there are
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:33:14PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > + if (!*sg)
> > + return sglist;
> > + else {
>
> No need for an else after an early return.
OK, good catch!
Thanks,
Ming
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 03:23:56PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:52:52PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > BTRFS and guard_bio_eod() need to get the last singlepage segment
> > from one multipage bvec, so introduce this helper to make them happy.
> >
> > Cc: Dave Chinner
> >
On 2018/11/19 上午3:37, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I opened a bug report[1]
Normally mail list will give you a quick response.
> about a situation I have with a btrfs filesystem on my
> backup server. Looks like there is internal errors inside the filesytem which
> cannot be fixed
Hello,
I opened a bug report[1] about a situation I have with a btrfs filesystem on my
backup server. Looks like there is internal errors inside the filesytem which
cannot be fixed by btrfs check. Currently, each time I cat a specific file, the
filesystem is remounted read-only.
How can I get
13 matches
Mail list logo
