Hi Hugo,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 02:18:06PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 02:07:54PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > However, the FAQ
> > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Help.21_Btrfs_claims_I.27m_out_of_space.2C_but_it_looks_like_I_should_ha
ug symbols installed after
this log extrct was obtained. Is there a tool which can help to make
this trace useable?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Ger
arc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
--
To unsubscribe from th
to me now.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an A
er this changes
btrfs' allocation behavior. I have never looked at apt's pdiff stuff
in detail, but I guess that it creates many tiny temporary files.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. Th
ing longterm.
What kind of work is being done to address this major usability issue?
What is the timeframe for a fix?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Heade
ble space in raid6, and to
> have it replicated each night to another btrfs server for "backup" of
> the backup, how should we then install btrfs?
Do you plan to use Snapshots? How many of them?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
': No space left on device
mh@fan:~$
What is going on here? How do I get away from here?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose t
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:15:21AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> On Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 22:14:50 CET Marc Haber wrote:
> > I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing
> > (with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable):
> >
>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:22:45AM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 01:08:29AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Why wouldn't btrfs allocate more data chunks from the ample free space?
>
>It's a bug. It's been around for years (literally), but nobody's
> tracked
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:56:58AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote on 2016/02/27 22:14 +0100:
> >I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing
> >(with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable):
> >
> >mh@fan:~$ sudo btrf
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:17:24AM +1100, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> On 13 March 2016 at 22:58, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> The alternative if this can't be
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Marc Haber
> <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Something is happening with the usage of
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:14:45PM +0100, Henk Slager wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Marc Haber
> <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> The alternative
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 05:12:35PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Marc Haber posted on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:58:10 +0100 as excerpted:
> > I see the same metadata spread as with the old filesystem in btrfs fi
> > df,
> > totl at 23 and used at 2.38 GiB. What I find strange is that th
s.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
--
To unsubscribe from this list
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:58:09PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > The alternative if this can't be fixed, is to recreate the filesystem
> > because there's no practical way yet to migrate so many snapshots to a
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:00:13AM +0100, Henk Slager wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>
> wrote:
> > Yes, I want to keep the possibility to remove huge files from
> > snapshots that shouldnt have been on a snapshotted volum
looking at "ofanbtr" after I changed the
subject to avoid mixing up both instances.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose thi
521]mh@fan:~$ df -h
> Maybe btrfs check --repair can also fix it, but before doing --repair
> or other actions, I would see what else besides btrfs could be wrong,
> see also suggestion of Holger.
Like putting the filesystem on an unencrypted medium? Sorry, no,
private data, paranoia.
G
Hi Henk,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:46:54PM +0100, Henk Slager wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>
> wrote:
> > Mar 14 10:23:49 fan mh: BEGIN btrfs-balance script
> > Mar 14 10:23:49 fan mh: btrfs fi df /
> > Mar 14 1
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:05:46PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> [10/509]mh@fan:~$ sudo btrfs check /media/tempdisk/
> Superblock bytenr is larger than device size
> Couldn't open file system
> [11/509]mh@fan:~$
After umounting and btrfs check the block device, things seem to be
fine n
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:15:33PM +0100, Henk Slager wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Henk Slager wrote:
> >> The other question is: What is mounted on /media/te
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:29:32PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> After umounting and btrfs check the block device, things seem to be
> fine now
But, umounting the btrfs seemed to trigger the following kernel traces:
Mar 15 14:21:30 fan kernel: [92308.377104] [ cut here ]--
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:54:06AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2016-03-15 09:46, Marc Haber wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:52:30AM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> >>On 03/14/16 21:13, Marc Haber wrote:
> >>>Do I need to wait for clear_cache to
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:52:30AM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 03/14/16 21:13, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Do I need to wait for clear_cache to finish, like until I see disk
> > usage dropping?
>
> The cache isn't that big, so you won't see a huge drop. Just use the
>
proper flags to blot out the filenames for privacy. And what
> btrfs-progs tools were used to create this file system. Etc.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114451
Please advise if there is something missing.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quil
spc_debug, that might be useful for a developer?
The later logs I posted were actually taken with enospc_debug, the
4.4.3 ones even with Duncan's patch. I think I didn't apply it before
building 4.4.4.
Greetings
Marc
--
--------
ut ENOSPC, but no visible
decrease of total Metadata size.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fo
e same issue? Would the log help
as addition in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114451?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, G
.
Is there any possiblity to cancel the pending balance without mounting
the fs first?
I have also filed https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115581
to adress this in a more elegant way.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc
ere's no practical way yet to migrate so many snapshots to a
> new file system.
I am now back to a mid three-digit number of snapshots.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. Th
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:43:46AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Marc Haber posted on Sat, 05 Mar 2016 21:09:09 +0100 as excerpted:
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Something is happening with the usage of this file system that's out of
d" as I only removed those clutter messages from the logs I
sent.
Greetings
Marc
[1] Does RHEL 6 have btrfs in the first place?
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
L
napshots. If anything increase it. The idea is to reproduce the bug.
... losing another pile of snapshots in the process? This is a
productive machine[1].
Greetings
Marc
[1] yes, with off-line backups being made
--
-----
M
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > So understanding the usage is important to figuring out what's
> > happening. I'd file a bug and include as much information on how the
> > f
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:27:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> how long is btrfs-image taking to run on a 400 GiB filesystem?
>
> I have /bin/btrfs-image -s -t 8 -s /dev/mapper/mydevice - | pixz -9 >
> file.on.other.fs running for four hours now
Strike my question please, I didn't
wasted for that. btrfs-image behaves as
documented, everything else was a problem existing between chair and
keyboard. Sorry for the noise.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mai
bad about
> kernel versioning
Just to get back to this thread's subject, I am using Debian unstable,
with a vanilla kernel, 4.4.3 at the beginning of this thread, and
4.4.4 today.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber
put.
Is that expeced behavior?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by
. btrfs balance cancel just hangs around with
no visible reaction for hours.
Log appended. Is there rescue?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Ge
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 04:38:57PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 03/05/16 15:17, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> Then try to balance in small increments.
> >
> > -dusage=5 and incrementing? Or what do you mean with "in small
> > increments"?
>
> Exa
Hi Chris,
I apologize for not being able to deliver logs in the way you might
find them more helpful.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:08:10PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>
> wrote:
> > I have another btrf
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:09:39PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 03/04/16 18:31, Marc Haber wrote:
> > I have another btrfs on the same host that has no the no space left on
> > device balance issue, but on another disk. On this btrfs, it seems
> > like a bal
stem or under, and you won't have that problem
> to worry about. =:^)
That needs to be documented prominently. Ths ZFS fanbois will love that.
> Oh, and btrfs quota management exacerbates the scaling issues
> dramatically. If you're using btrfs quotas
Am not, thankfully.
Greetings
Marc
5292589/ has another log of mine with btrfs
fi usage calls as well, just in case this helps.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:14:50PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing
> (with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable):
just for the record: The host started acting up in more and more
interesting ways, and after
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:30:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>
> > wrote:
> > > btrfs balance -mprofiles seems to do something. o
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>
> wrote:
> > btrfs balance -mprofiles seems to do something. one kworked and one
> > btrfs-transaction process hog one CPU co
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:41:53PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Marc Haber
> <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:16:30PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
> >> Am Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:00:04 +0200
> >
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 08:31:17PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:44:32 +0200
> schrieb Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > > Am Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:57:25 +0200
> &g
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:30:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Henk Slager
nism" rc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:01:37PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:21:12 +0200
> Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> > the balance restarts immediately after mounting
>
> You can use the skip_balance mount option to prevent that.
Thanks
67526 /dev/dm-31
No, the filesystem was not converted, it was directly created as
btrfs, and no, I didn't try mounting it.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im H
ed since November 2014 and is still with
kernel 3.16
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 62
--repair, or is this all a
userspace matter?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 160040
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:57:25 +0200
> schrieb Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:16:30PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > > Am Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:00:04 +0200
> >
eports that
Thermal Table has changed
Apr 1 11:16:39 swivel kernel: [249949.723795] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0:
link is not ready
This btrfs is ripe for the backup-format-restore procedure, right?
Greetings
Marc
--
---
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:42:46PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote:
> So also false alerts.
btrfs-tools 4.5.1 with Qu's patch from patchwork doesnt show those
warnings any more.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber |
:37:08 fan kernel: [ 429.488724] [] ?
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6d
Mar 22 22:37:08 fan kernel: [ 429.488725] ---[ end trace 63ee8891bd9de879 ]---
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust C
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 08:43:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:35:32PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> > As far as what the kernel is involved with, the easy way to check is if it's
> > operating on a mounted filesystem or not. If it only oper
sult from
> this.
This basically means that I am ripe for a new mkfs.btrfs, right?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:37:14PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> I have a btrfs which btrfs check --repair doesn't fix:
>
> # btrfs check --repair /dev/mapper/fanbtr
> bad metadata [4425377054720, 4425377071104) crossing stripe boundary
> bad metadata [4425380134912, 4425380151296)
at I wanted to read on this filesystem.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nord
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:00:19PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote on 2016/03/29 08:43 +0200:
> >On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:35:32PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> >>Did you convert this filesystem from ext4 (or ext3)?
> >
> >No.
> >
> >&
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:16:30PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:00:04 +0200
> schrieb Marc Haber <mh+linux-bt...@zugschlus.de>:
> > I find it somewhere between funny and disturbing that the first call
> > of btrfs check made my kernel log the following:
ith this file system?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |
s
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
--
To
s
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
-
uccessful rebalance
with 4.8 fix a filesystem, or is the recommended way still "backup,
format, restore, lose all snapshots"?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mail
has happened here
and how to avoid things like that in the future. Do more recently
created btrfs filesystems have safeguards against damage that may occur
when a filesystem fills up?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:15:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:15:31AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > I have wrecked another btrfs file system, probably for good this time.
> >
> > It's a 80 GB filesystem from 2015, in my secondary notebook, on
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:15:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Ouch, this is generally harmless unless your disk lies about barriers.
> > Btrfs absolutely depends on them, and tends to suffer catastrophic
> >
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> I do have a dd copy of the device now.
>
> $ sudo losetup --find --show ./dropbtr0.btrfs
> $ sudo mount -o skip_balance -t btrfs /dev/loop0 /mnt/tempdisk
>
> does immediately result in:
>
> Apr 12 22:37:48 f
76 matches
Mail list logo
