On Thursday 15 July 2010 11:07:07 Miao Xie wrote:
On Thu Jul 15 2010 16:14:31 GMT+0800 (CST), Yan, Zheng wrote:
2010/7/15 Miao Xiemi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi, everyone
I found btrfs will hangup when we run the sync command on my
x86_64 box.
The reproduce steps is following:
#
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:46:17 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
So we must do more check in the mkfs.btrfs to avoid misuse, and I'll
add some check of the sectorsize into the mkfs.btrfs.
Yes, but this is fixed up with the raid code, we'll allow different page
sizes.
Is the raid code that you said the
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:12:13 -0400, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
It seems that the btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize which is
greater than the page size just like ext2/3/4, though we can use
mkfs.btrfs to make a filesystem with a big sectorsize. Am I right?
If yes, we must do
2010/7/15 Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi, everyone
I found btrfs will hangup when we run the sync command on my
x86_64 box.
The reproduce steps is following:
# mkfs.btrfs -s 8192 -l 8192 -n 8192 /dev/sda1
# mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
# echo 1234567 /mnt/aaa
# sync
(btrfs hangs up)
It
On Thu Jul 15 2010 16:14:31 GMT+0800 (CST), Yan, Zheng wrote:
2010/7/15 Miao Xiemi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi, everyone
I found btrfs will hangup when we run the sync command on my
x86_64 box.
The reproduce steps is following:
# mkfs.btrfs -s 8192 -l 8192 -n 8192 /dev/sda1
# mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
#
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:07:07PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On Thu Jul 15 2010 16:14:31 GMT+0800 (CST), Yan, Zheng wrote:
2010/7/15 Miao Xiemi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi, everyone
I found btrfs will hangup when we run the sync command on my
x86_64 box.
The reproduce steps is following:
#
Hi, everyone
I found btrfs will hangup when we run the sync command on my
x86_64 box.
The reproduce steps is following:
# mkfs.btrfs -s 8192 -l 8192 -n 8192 /dev/sda1
# mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
# echo 1234567 /mnt/aaa
# sync
(btrfs hangs up)
It seems that the btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize
