On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:40:44AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 09/04/2021 02:33, Boris Burkov wrote:
> > The tree checker currently rejects unrecognized flags when it reads
> > btrfs_inode_item. Practically, this means that adding a new flag makes
> > the change backwards incompatible if the flag
On 09/04/2021 02:33, Boris Burkov wrote:
The tree checker currently rejects unrecognized flags when it reads
btrfs_inode_item. Practically, this means that adding a new flag makes
the change backwards incompatible if the flag is ever set on a file.
Take up one of the 4 reserved u64 fields in
The tree checker currently rejects unrecognized flags when it reads
btrfs_inode_item. Practically, this means that adding a new flag makes
the change backwards incompatible if the flag is ever set on a file.
Take up one of the 4 reserved u64 fields in the btrfs_inode_item as a
new "compat_flags".
