On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:46:32PM +0800, Damenly Su wrote:
> Sorry for the previous reply in HTML format which is not delivered to
> the mail list.
>
> I mean there is already xfstests generic/405 for the situation.
> Thin provision devices need to call dmsetup to setup.
> I wonder If calling
Sorry for the previous reply in HTML format which is not delivered to
the mail list.
I mean there is already xfstests generic/405 for the situation.
Thin provision devices need to call dmsetup to setup.
I wonder If calling dmsetup in progs tests is acceptable or not.
If it is, I will do it.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 04:39:45PM +0800, Su Yue wrote:
> when mkfs.btrfs on a thin provision device which has very small
> backing size and big virtual size, all code works well in
> mkfs.btrfs until close_ctree() is called.
> close_ctree() fails to sync device due to small backing size
> while
On 2018年04月03日 16:39, Su Yue wrote:
> when mkfs.btrfs on a thin provision device which has very small
> backing size and big virtual size, all code works well in
> mkfs.btrfs until close_ctree() is called.
> close_ctree() fails to sync device due to small backing size
> while closing devices.
>
