On 07/24/2014 11:37 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
We should not write data into a readonly device especially seed device when
doing scrub, skip those devices.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index b6d198f..23d3f6e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -2904,6 +2904,7 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64
devid, u64 start,
struct scrub_ctx *sctx;
int ret;
struct btrfs_device *dev;
+ struct rcu_string *name;
if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2965,6 +2966,16 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64
devid, u64 start,
return -ENODEV;
}
+ if (!is_dev_replace !readonly !dev-writeable) {
just reading the commit message would ask question what
about readonly scrub anyway. Nice readonly scrub case
is taken care as well.
+ mutex_unlock(fs_info-fs_devices-device_list_mutex);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ name = rcu_dereference(dev-name);
+ btrfs_err(fs_info, scrub: device %s is not writable,
+ name-str);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -EROFS;
+ }
+
mutex_lock(fs_info-scrub_lock);
if (!dev-in_fs_metadata || dev-is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace) {
mutex_unlock(fs_info-scrub_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html