On 2021/4/16 下午9:54, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 4/15/21 1:04 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Unlike btrfs_file_extent_item, btrfs_ordered_extent has its length
limit (BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE), which is far smaller than U32_MAX.
Using u64 for those length related members are just a waste of memory.
This patch
On 4/15/21 1:04 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Unlike btrfs_file_extent_item, btrfs_ordered_extent has its length
limit (BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE), which is far smaller than U32_MAX.
Using u64 for those length related members are just a waste of memory.
This patch will make the following members u32:
- num_
