Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Add a command to show bg info

2016-11-01 Thread divya . indi



On 10/28/2016 09:00 AM, David Sterba wrote:

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:35:14PM -0700, Divya Indi wrote:

Add a new subcommand to btrfs inspect-internal

btrfs inspect-internal bg_analysis 
Gives information about all the block groups.

The sample output from the cover letter should also go here (or just
here).

Below are some comments, but overall, I think the block group dumping
should be more advanced than just what this patch does. It's a good
start, but given the rich structure of the blockgroups and chunks, I'd
rather see the basics done right from the beginning.

The blockgroups and chunks can be viewed in a logical or physical way.
I've sent a patch some time agou, that dumps the physical structure, but
got reminded that the balance analysis is more interesting on the
logical level.

Ideally I'd like to keep both ways to show the information. The physical
way is easier, just iterate the device extents and print start, lenght
etc. The logical is more tricky as it's a tree structure, when one
logical chunk could comprised of several physical chunks. And this must
reflect all current raid profiles, where we're mixing mirorring and
striping, and chunks of special kind (parity).
Since most of this information is available through the chunk, we can 
try to implement these as part of v2.


Now, I'm not asking you to implement all of that, but I want to make
sure that code that touches the area of interest does not block further
extensions. I understand that you want to add the ability to optimize
the balance.


Signed-off-by: Divya Indi 
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant 
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo 
---
  cmds-inspect.c |  114 
  1 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cmds-inspect.c b/cmds-inspect.c
index f435ea9..0e2f15a 100644
--- a/cmds-inspect.c
+++ b/cmds-inspect.c
@@ -147,6 +147,118 @@ static int get_bg_info(int fd, struct 
btrfs_ioctl_search_args *bg_args,
}
return ret;
  }
+
+static const char * const cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage[] = {
+   "btrfs inspect-internal bg_analysis  ",
+   "Get information about all block groups",
+   "",
+   "",
+   NULL
+};
+
+static int cmd_inspect_bg_analysis(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args args;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args bg_args;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *header;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *bg_header;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *bg_sk;
+   struct btrfs_block_group_item *bg;
+   struct btrfs_chunk *chunk;
+   unsigned long off = 0;
+   unsigned long bg_off = 0;
+   DIR *dirstream = NULL;
+   int fd;
+   int i;
+   int ret = 0;
+   u64 used;
+   u64 flags;
+   char bg_type[32] = {0};
+
+   if (check_argc_exact(argc, 2))
+   usage(cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage);
+
+   fd = btrfs_open_dir(argv[optind], , 1);
+   if (fd < 0)
+   return 1;
+
+   memset(, 0, sizeof(args));
+   sk = 
+   sk->min_offset = sk->min_transid = 0;
+   sk->max_offset = sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
+   printf("%20s%20s%20s%20s\n", "Type", "Start", "Len", "Used");
+   while (1) {
+
+   /* Walk through the chunk tree and retrieve all the chunks */
+   ret = get_chunks(fd, );
+   if (ret < 0)
+   goto out;
+
+   /*
+* it should not happen.
+*/
+   if (sk->nr_items == 0)
+   break;

So is this an error condition? If yes, then it should be handled.


+
+   off = 0;
+   memset(_args, 0, sizeof(bg_args));
+   bg_sk = _args.key;
+
+   bg_sk->tree_id = BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID;
+   bg_sk->min_type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
+   bg_sk->max_type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
+   bg_sk->min_transid =  0;
+   bg_sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
+
+   for (i = 0; i < sk->nr_items; i++) {
+   header = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *)(args.buf
+ + off);
+   off += sizeof(*header);
+   if (header->type == BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY) {
+   chunk = (struct btrfs_chunk *)
+   (args.buf + off);
+
+   /* For every chunk lookup an exact match(bg) in
+* the extent tree and read its used values */

Comment formatting


+   ret = get_bg_info(fd, _args, header->offset,
+ chunk->length);
+   if (ret < 0)
+

Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Add a command to show bg info

2016-10-28 Thread David Sterba
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:35:14PM -0700, Divya Indi wrote:
> Add a new subcommand to btrfs inspect-internal
> 
> btrfs inspect-internal bg_analysis 
> Gives information about all the block groups.

The sample output from the cover letter should also go here (or just
here).

Below are some comments, but overall, I think the block group dumping
should be more advanced than just what this patch does. It's a good
start, but given the rich structure of the blockgroups and chunks, I'd
rather see the basics done right from the beginning.

The blockgroups and chunks can be viewed in a logical or physical way.
I've sent a patch some time agou, that dumps the physical structure, but
got reminded that the balance analysis is more interesting on the
logical level.

Ideally I'd like to keep both ways to show the information. The physical
way is easier, just iterate the device extents and print start, lenght
etc. The logical is more tricky as it's a tree structure, when one
logical chunk could comprised of several physical chunks. And this must
reflect all current raid profiles, where we're mixing mirorring and
striping, and chunks of special kind (parity).

Now, I'm not asking you to implement all of that, but I want to make
sure that code that touches the area of interest does not block further
extensions. I understand that you want to add the ability to optimize
the balance.

> Signed-off-by: Divya Indi 
> Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant 
> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo 
> ---
>  cmds-inspect.c |  114 
> 
>  1 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/cmds-inspect.c b/cmds-inspect.c
> index f435ea9..0e2f15a 100644
> --- a/cmds-inspect.c
> +++ b/cmds-inspect.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,118 @@ static int get_bg_info(int fd, struct 
> btrfs_ioctl_search_args *bg_args,
>   }
>   return ret;
>  }
> +
> +static const char * const cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage[] = {
> + "btrfs inspect-internal bg_analysis  ",
> + "Get information about all block groups",
> + "",
> + "",
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static int cmd_inspect_bg_analysis(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args args;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args bg_args;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *header;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *bg_header;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *bg_sk;
> + struct btrfs_block_group_item *bg;
> + struct btrfs_chunk *chunk;
> + unsigned long off = 0;
> + unsigned long bg_off = 0;
> + DIR *dirstream = NULL;
> + int fd;
> + int i;
> + int ret = 0;
> + u64 used;
> + u64 flags;
> + char bg_type[32] = {0};
> +
> + if (check_argc_exact(argc, 2))
> + usage(cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage);
> +
> + fd = btrfs_open_dir(argv[optind], , 1);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return 1;
> +
> + memset(, 0, sizeof(args));
> + sk = 
> + sk->min_offset = sk->min_transid = 0;
> + sk->max_offset = sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
> + printf("%20s%20s%20s%20s\n", "Type", "Start", "Len", "Used");
> + while (1) {
> +
> + /* Walk through the chunk tree and retrieve all the chunks */
> + ret = get_chunks(fd, );
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
> +  * it should not happen.
> +  */
> + if (sk->nr_items == 0)
> + break;

So is this an error condition? If yes, then it should be handled.

> +
> + off = 0;
> + memset(_args, 0, sizeof(bg_args));
> + bg_sk = _args.key;
> +
> + bg_sk->tree_id = BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID;
> + bg_sk->min_type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
> + bg_sk->max_type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
> + bg_sk->min_transid =  0;
> + bg_sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sk->nr_items; i++) {
> + header = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *)(args.buf
> +   + off);
> + off += sizeof(*header);
> + if (header->type == BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY) {
> + chunk = (struct btrfs_chunk *)
> + (args.buf + off);
> +
> + /* For every chunk lookup an exact match(bg) in
> +  * the extent tree and read its used values */

Comment formatting

> + ret = get_bg_info(fd, _args, header->offset,
> +   chunk->length);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
> +  * it 

Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Add a command to show bg info

2016-10-19 Thread Divya Indi



On 10/17/2016 10:24 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:39:32 +0800
Qu Wenruo  wrote:


  static const char * const cmd_inspect_inode_resolve_usage[] = {
"btrfs inspect-internal inode-resolve [-v]  ",
"Get file system paths for the given inode",
@@ -702,6 +814,8 @@ const struct cmd_group inspect_cmd_group = {
0 },
{ "min-dev-size", cmd_inspect_min_dev_size,
cmd_inspect_min_dev_size_usage, NULL, 0 },
+   { "bg_analysis", cmd_inspect_bg_analysis,
+   cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage, NULL, 0 },

Just naming preference, IMHO show-block-groups or dump-block-groups
seems better for me.

And in any case please don't mix separation by "-" and "_" in the same command
string. In btrfs tool the convention is to separate words in subcommand names
using "-".


Noted, thanks! Will update the patch to correct this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Add a command to show bg info

2016-10-17 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:39:32 +0800
Qu Wenruo  wrote:

> >  static const char * const cmd_inspect_inode_resolve_usage[] = {
> > "btrfs inspect-internal inode-resolve [-v]  ",
> > "Get file system paths for the given inode",
> > @@ -702,6 +814,8 @@ const struct cmd_group inspect_cmd_group = {
> > 0 },
> > { "min-dev-size", cmd_inspect_min_dev_size,
> > cmd_inspect_min_dev_size_usage, NULL, 0 },
> > +   { "bg_analysis", cmd_inspect_bg_analysis,
> > +   cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage, NULL, 0 },
> 
> Just naming preference, IMHO show-block-groups or dump-block-groups 
> seems better for me.

And in any case please don't mix separation by "-" and "_" in the same command
string. In btrfs tool the convention is to separate words in subcommand names
using "-".

-- 
With respect,
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Add a command to show bg info

2016-10-17 Thread Qu Wenruo



At 10/18/2016 08:35 AM, Divya Indi wrote:

Add a new subcommand to btrfs inspect-internal

btrfs inspect-internal bg_analysis 
Gives information about all the block groups.

Signed-off-by: Divya Indi 
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant 
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo 
---
 cmds-inspect.c |  114 
 1 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cmds-inspect.c b/cmds-inspect.c
index f435ea9..0e2f15a 100644
--- a/cmds-inspect.c
+++ b/cmds-inspect.c
@@ -147,6 +147,118 @@ static int get_bg_info(int fd, struct 
btrfs_ioctl_search_args *bg_args,
}
return ret;
 }
+
+static const char * const cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage[] = {
+   "btrfs inspect-internal bg_analysis  ",
+   "Get information about all block groups",


What about get bg info for given range, and not all?

I think it's just several new parameters, as your design is capable to 
handle that.



+   "",
+   "",
+   NULL
+};
+
+static int cmd_inspect_bg_analysis(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args args;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args bg_args;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *header;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *bg_header;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk;
+   struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *bg_sk;
+   struct btrfs_block_group_item *bg;
+   struct btrfs_chunk *chunk;
+   unsigned long off = 0;
+   unsigned long bg_off = 0;
+   DIR *dirstream = NULL;
+   int fd;
+   int i;
+   int ret = 0;
+   u64 used;
+   u64 flags;
+   char bg_type[32] = {0};
+
+   if (check_argc_exact(argc, 2))
+   usage(cmd_inspect_bg_analysis_usage);
+
+   fd = btrfs_open_dir(argv[optind], , 1);
+   if (fd < 0)
+   return 1;
+
+   memset(, 0, sizeof(args));
+   sk = 
+   sk->min_offset = sk->min_transid = 0;
+   sk->max_offset = sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
+   printf("%20s%20s%20s%20s\n", "Type", "Start", "Len", "Used");
+   while (1) {
+
+   /* Walk through the chunk tree and retrieve all the chunks */
+   ret = get_chunks(fd, );
+   if (ret < 0)
+   goto out;
+
+   /*
+* it should not happen.
+*/
+   if (sk->nr_items == 0)
+   break;
+
+   off = 0;
+   memset(_args, 0, sizeof(bg_args));
+   bg_sk = _args.key;
+
+   bg_sk->tree_id = BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID;
+   bg_sk->min_type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
+   bg_sk->max_type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
+   bg_sk->min_transid =  0;
+   bg_sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
+
+   for (i = 0; i < sk->nr_items; i++) {
+   header = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *)(args.buf
+ + off);
+   off += sizeof(*header);
+   if (header->type == BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY) {
+   chunk = (struct btrfs_chunk *)
+   (args.buf + off);
+
+   /* For every chunk lookup an exact match(bg) in
+* the extent tree and read its used values */
+   ret = get_bg_info(fd, _args, header->offset,
+ chunk->length);
+   if (ret < 0)
+   goto out;
+
+   /*
+* it should not happen.
+*/
+   if (bg_sk->nr_items == 0)
+   continue;
+
+   bg_off = 0;
+   bg_header = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *)
+   (bg_args.buf + bg_off);
+   bg_off += sizeof(*bg_header);
+   bg = (struct btrfs_block_group_item *)
+(bg_args.buf + bg_off);
+
+   used = btrfs_block_group_used(bg);
+   memset(_type, 0, 32);
+   flags = btrfs_block_group_flags(bg);
+   bg_flags_to_str(flags, bg_type);
+   printf("%20s%20llu%20s%20s\n",
+   bg_type,
+   bg_header->objectid,
+   pretty_size(bg_header->offset),
+   pretty_size(used));


BTW, it would be quite handy if we can specify units.


+   }
+   off