Swâmi Petaramesh wrote (ao):
But I've been using pretty *anything over LUKS/LVM for years, and I've
never notice it cause any (noticeable to the point of becoming annoying)
system slowdown, whatever tasks I may have processed in such setups
(including servers, big databases, compilations, NAS,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:54:30PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi folks,
My laptop is a Core i3-2310M with 4 GB RAM, running BTRFS on a 1 TB HD.
I run Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal, kernel 3.5.0-19-generic 64-bit.
Try 3.7. That's had some significant performance improvements. 3.5
is over 6
Le 03/12/2012 13:09, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Try 3.7. That's had some significant performance improvements. 3.5 is
over 6 months old, which is a long time in btrfs development.
I understand the suggestion from a developper's PoV, but from a user's
that's much too much hassle living ahead of one's
Hi Swâmi,
On Mon, December 03, 2012 at 12:54 (+0100), Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi folks,
My laptop is a Core i3-2310M with 4 GB RAM, running BTRFS on a 1 TB HD.
I run Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal, kernel 3.5.0-19-generic 64-bit.
I wanted to give a shot at bitcoin so I installed it from the
Le 03/12/2012 16:55, Jan Schmidt a écrit :
Use ubuntu (which in the default setup means you're using ecryptfs for
your /home),
I actually do not use ecryptfs here, but OTOH I have BTRFS over LUKS/LVM.
But I've been using pretty *anything over LUKS/LVM for years, and I've
never notice it cause
Hi Swâmi,
On 12/03/2012 04:09 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:54:30PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi folks,
My laptop is a Core i3-2310M with 4 GB RAM, running BTRFS on a 1 TB HD.
I run Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal, kernel 3.5.0-19-generic 64-bit.
Try 3.7. That's had some
On 03/12/12 23:24, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
I understand the suggestion from a developper's PoV, but from a
user's that's much too much hassle living ahead of one's distro's
kernel, or using vanilla ones. Been there, done that. No more
suffering for me please ;-))
I'll have to stick with
Hi Chris,
Le 04/12/2012 03:18, Chris Samuel a écrit :
In that case maybe using an experimental filesystem that is under rapid
development might not be a good choice, it might be better to stick to
one of the existing stable filesystems instead.
I already made the move back and forth ext4 -
