Hello Steve,
Steve Freitas wrote (ao):
Alright, I'll trash it and start over with a different drive.
With the danger of mentioning the obvious: you could do a few
destructive badblocks runs on that disk to see if SMART keeps adding up
to the bad blocks list.
With kind regards, Sander
Hi all,
I was under the mistaken impression that btrfs checksumming, in its
current default configuration, protected your data from bitrot. It
appears this is not the case:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 18:24 +0100, Johannes Hirte wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 16:59:55 schrieb Steve Freitas:
So
Steve Freitas wrote:
Hi all,
I was under the mistaken impression that btrfs checksumming, in its
current default configuration, protected your data from bitrot. It
appears this is not the case:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 18:24 +0100, Johannes Hirte wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 16:59:55
Am Donnerstag 07 Januar 2010 20:29:49 schrieb jim owens:
Steve Freitas wrote:
Hi all,
I was under the mistaken impression that btrfs checksumming, in its
current default configuration, protected your data from bitrot. It
appears this is not the case:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 18:24
Hello Steve,
Steve Freitas wrote (ao):
Should I take it by the lack of list response that I should just flush
this partition down the toilet and start over? Or is everybody either
flummoxed or on vacation?
I don't have your original mail, but I think I remember you mentioned a
lot of bad
Hi Sander,
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 08:52 +0100, Sander wrote:
I don't have your original mail, but I think I remember you mentioned a
lot of bad sectors on that disk reported by SMART.
If that is indeed the case it might be dificult for the people who might
be able to help you, to help you.
Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 16:59:55 schrieb Steve Freitas:
Hi Sander,
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 08:52 +0100, Sander wrote:
I don't have your original mail, but I think I remember you mentioned a
lot of bad sectors on that disk reported by SMART.
If that is indeed the case it might be
Hi Johannes,
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 18:24 +0100, Johannes Hirte wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 16:59:55 schrieb Steve Freitas:
Thanks for your response. You're correct about the bad sector warning.
So please correct me if I have some mistaken assumptions. I thought
btrfs would be
Should I take it by the lack of list response that I should just flush
this partition down the toilet and start over? Or is everybody either
flummoxed or on vacation?
Steve
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 16:37 -0800, Steve Freitas wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 14:57 -0800, Steve Freitas wrote:
Got some
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 14:57 -0800, Steve Freitas wrote:
Got some more information. I installed Debian on another disk (rescue)
running 2.6.32, pulled the latest btrfs module code from git, applied an
earlier mentioned patch[1], then compiled and loaded the new module.
It's able to mount the
10 matches
Mail list logo
