On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, at 4:31 AM, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
> I have noticed an unusual amount of crc-errors in downloaded rars,
> beginning about a week ago. But lets start with the preliminaries. I
> am using Debian Stretch.
> Kernel: Linux mars 4.9.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u4
On 2018/12/3 下午5:31, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed an unusual amount of crc-errors in downloaded rars,
> beginning about a week ago. But lets start with the preliminaries. I
> am using Debian Stretch.
> Kernel: Linux mars 4.9.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u4
On 2018/10/23 上午4:02, Gervais, Francois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I lost power on my btrfs disk and it looks like it is now in an
> unfunctional state.
What does the word "unfunctional" mean?
Unable to mount? Or what else?
>
> Any idea how I could debug that issue?
>
> Here is what I have:
Zygo Blaxell posted on Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:31:45 -0500 as excerpted:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:11:18AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 2, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Zygo Blaxell zblax...@furryterror.org
wrote:
btrfs seems to assume the data is correct on both disks (the
generation numbers and
On Nov 3, 2014, at 9:31 PM, Zygo Blaxell zblax...@furryterror.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:11:18AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 2, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Zygo Blaxell zblax...@furryterror.org wrote:
btrfs seems to assume the data is correct on both disks (the generation
numbers
Chris Murphy posted on Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:28:39 -0700 as excerpted:
It needs to be more than a sequential number. If one of the disks
disappears we need to record this fact on the surviving disks, and also
cope with _both_ disks claiming to be the surviving one.
I agree this is also a
On 11/04/2014 10:28 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 3, 2014, at 9:31 PM, Zygo Blaxell zblax...@furryterror.org wrote:
Now we have two disks with equal generation numbers. Generations 6..9
on sda are not the same as generations 6..9 on sdb, so if we mix the
two disks' metadata we get bad
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:28:39AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 3, 2014, at 9:31 PM, Zygo Blaxell zblax...@furryterror.org wrote:
It needs to be more than a sequential number. If one of the disks
disappears we need to record this fact on the surviving disks, and also
cope with _both_
On Nov 2, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Zygo Blaxell zblax...@furryterror.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:57:22PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
For example if I have a two device Btrfs raid1 for both data and
metadata, and one device is removed and I mount -o degraded,rw one
of them and make some
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:11:18AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 2, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Zygo Blaxell zblax...@furryterror.org wrote:
btrfs seems to assume the data is correct on both disks (the generation
numbers and checksums are OK) but gets confused by equally plausible but
different
On Nov 1, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Robert White rwh...@pobox.com wrote:
On 10/31/2014 10:34 AM, Tobias Holst wrote:
I am now using another system with kernel 3.17.2 and btrfs-tools 3.17
and inserted one of the two HDDs of my btrfs-RAID1 to it. I can't add
the second one as there are only two slots
Thank you for your reply.
I'll answer in-line.
2014-11-02 5:49 GMT+01:00 Robert White rwh...@pobox.com:
On 10/31/2014 10:34 AM, Tobias Holst wrote:
I am now using another system with kernel 3.17.2 and btrfs-tools 3.17
and inserted one of the two HDDs of my btrfs-RAID1 to it. I can't add
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:57:22PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 1, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Robert White rwh...@pobox.com wrote:
On 10/31/2014 10:34 AM, Tobias Holst wrote:
I am now using another system with kernel 3.17.2 and btrfs-tools 3.17
and inserted one of the two HDDs of my
On 11/02/2014 06:55 PM, Tobias Holst wrote:
But I can't do a balance anymore?
root@t-mon:~# btrfs balance start /dev/sda1
ERROR: can't access '/dev/sda1'
Balance takes place on a mounted filesystem not a native block device.
So...
mount -t btrfs /dev/sda1 /some/path/somewhere
btrfs balance
On 10/31/2014 10:34 AM, Tobias Holst wrote:
I am now using another system with kernel 3.17.2 and btrfs-tools 3.17
and inserted one of the two HDDs of my btrfs-RAID1 to it. I can't add
the second one as there are only two slots in that server.
This is what I got:
tobby@ubuntu: sudo btrfs
I am now using another system with kernel 3.17.2 and btrfs-tools 3.17
and inserted one of the two HDDs of my btrfs-RAID1 to it. I can't add
the second one as there are only two slots in that server.
This is what I got:
tobby@ubuntu: sudo btrfs check /dev/sdb1
warning, device 2 is missing
Addition:
I found some posts here about a general file system corruption in 3.17
and 3.17.1 - is this the cause?
Additionally I am using ro-snapshots - maybe this is the cause, too?
Anyway: Can I fix that or do I have to reinstall? Haven't touched the
filesystem, just did a scrub (found 0
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Tobias Holst to...@tobby.eu wrote:
Addition:
I found some posts here about a general file system corruption in 3.17
and 3.17.1 - is this the cause?
Additionally I am using ro-snapshots - maybe this is the cause, too?
Anyway: Can I fix that or do I have to
18 matches
Mail list logo
