Re: stability matrix (was: Is stability a joke?)

2016-09-19 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
+1 for all your changes with the following comments in addition... On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 17:27 +0200, David Sterba wrote: > That's more like a usecase, thats out of the scope of the tabular > overview. But we have an existing page UseCases that I'd like to > transform to a more structured and

Re: stability matrix (was: Is stability a joke?)

2016-09-19 Thread David Sterba
Hi, On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:14:04AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > In general: > - I think another column should be added, which tells when and for >   which kernel version the feature-status of each row was  >   revised/updated the last time and especially by whom. >   If a core dev

Re: stability matrix (was: Is stability a joke?)

2016-09-14 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey. As for the stability matrix... In general: - I think another column should be added, which tells when and for   which kernel version the feature-status of each row was    revised/updated the last time and especially by whom.   If a core dev makes a statement on a particular feature, this